Yeah, right, dead terrorists have privacy rights but we don’t have the right to know who takes our money and spends it on killing innocent civilians.
Yet lay abiding gun owners have no right to privacy at all.
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea!
The non-citizen terrorist is dead, Jim.
Get your guns illegall and the Democrats will protect your privacy.
Go through their system and they will not.
Class- what did we learn?
This will get good - the long Patrick stalls, the bigger ass he becomes.
Hey Guv!
Since when do dead terrorists have “privacy rights”?
What you’re telling us is that you don’t want folks to know how much of our tax money is funding foreign welfare cheats.
Transparency in government is really working according to Obama!
DEMOCRAT Gorvernor Patrick is just one of many of our corrupt liberal ruling class circling the wagons to try to shield the extent to which they have been going to support and to enable various anti-American entities such as the Moslem jihadists.
Folks have begun connecting way too many dots!
This should be a major issue in the special MA special election for the U.S. Senate seat that Kerry gave up to go to SoS. Let’s see just how bad the average MA voter is or is not. This is as good an opportunity as they will have to show what they are.
They would have to cough it up under subpoena, but since it’s Holder who’s prosecuting.....
It’s all a lie and a charade to protect THEM from criticism over how much of the public’s money they gave to terrorists. I think inquiring minds want to know just how screwed up Boston and this country really are.
The lesson:
Illegals have privacy.
Those that follow the system, do not.
He’s a KILLER and he’s dead.
Besides aren’t dems the ones telling us we have to give up our privacy rights?
Guess they mean middle class citizens must give up their rights... but not criminals and terrorists...
I’ll just betcha that Bostonians are really loving their Governor about now.
Can you imagine how insulted they must feel, after what they just went through?
In fact, as mentioned in related threads, Justice John Marshall had officially clarified that Congress is prohibited from laying taxes for any purpose that it cannot justify under its Article I, Section 8-limited powers, using tax dollars to buy phones for citizens being a 10th Amendment-protected state power.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." --Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
state sponsored terrorism — that state being Massachusetts
(Inside Nanzi Peelousy’s reptilian brain): “Disclosing that information would undermine the dignity of 500 million hardworking wel—uh, Mus—, er, Dem—or something. You know what I mean: Compassion!”
Meanwhile these same leftists had NO problem with that newspaper in New York listing every single gun owner..they were just fine with that but showing how much money a terrorist got, no they have a HUGE problem with that one