Ping
Things just get curiouser and curiouser, don’t they?
Judges just don’t wander into hospital rooms and read patients their rights. Since when do Judges read people their rights? Isn’t it the responsibility of the arresting officer, of someone in law enforcement - I.e., FBI?
In other news, a self-identified Muslim who attended an Indonesian madrassa and a Chicago church run by a “former” Muslim sits in the Oval Office.
She did not do this of her own initiative. She was told to do this
Since when does a judge insert herself into the investuigatory process before any case is brought to court (or, indeed, any final decision to even file a case)? Thiss appears to be a most peculiar event, to say the least. One could even question her right to prejudice the investigation, prejudice any case as may be filed, and to trespass into the hospital room in the first place (as it was under the control of the proper investigatory authorities at the time, albeit depending on local law an argument may be possible this is a good first stab at an analyis). Disbarment and criminal prosecution appear well worth consideration (and almost certainly would lead to the answer of who told her to do this). Or?
She did not show up at the court house on Monday and decide to go over to the hospital all on her own. Somehow she was assigned to go there, to mirandize him, and hold a hearing. In most federal courts, judges are appointed at random. I don’t know how a magistrate vs. district court judge would have been assigned this case.
How is it there was a lawyer for him also, just ready to go? Where did he come from? And did he make threat about his client not having been mirandized?
Are any FReepers members of the federal bar in Boston and familiar with how it works on case assignment, and this particular judge? I see she was first appointed during ‘41’s turn but that doesn’t really mean much. This whole thing is so peculiar we do have to learn more but I’m not sure this article is particularly helpful.
Accuracy in reporting:
It’s one thing to use metaphorical language in news piece, it is another to not elaborate on that language when it’s pertinent to the facts at hand, particularly when it was reported inaccurately by the source.
Fox does us no favors by beginning the poor use of grammar by stating “he stopped talking”, insinuating he can actually speak. In fact, other sources, citing details available to only those in the room, state he is “still unable to talk”.
I get the metaphor; I’m hip & clued-in. However, it is inaccurate reporting that has presented us this decade of journalistic bias at a level previously unseen in this country.
The facts presented here may well be accurate. But it was introduced by gross inaccuracy, akin to incompetence.
Integrity is not preserved by parroting bad reporting; we should all expect more from the likes of Front Page, Fox et al.
She is an al Qaeda-supporting non-Article III judge
pretending to be such.
She, herself, belongs in prison with Holder and
Osama’s son.
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don’t add you to the list...
Just another of hussein's happy little coinky dinks the msm isn't concerning themselves with.
So one should expect her to recuse herself right? /sarcasm-satire
Can we safely assume the 'we suck more ' boys of the New York Times won't find this newsworthy? Had a Tea Party judge gone in and stopped a right winger from giving information in a similar way the losers at the New York Times and Washington Post would be able to 'make the connections'...
Either we are false flagging it, or AQ is scheduling their attacks simultaneously with our "drills"!
Too many times one on top of the other, almost identical locations, almost identical times.
Which one does Occams razor cut?
False flag? or AQ scheduling?
Richard Nixon was an amateur compared to this administration (they owe him an apology too) and Watergate is nothing compared to this (or Bengazi). Let me add, Nixon might have been a bit of a crook but I really don’t think he’d place the country in harms way unlike what we have now. I have nothing against Miranda or reading it to him, but I think we should have held up until he spilled more beans. This smells to high heaven, the stench is so strong, it could knock off a buzzard off a garbage scowl.
Author Daniel Greenfield has her title wrong. A magistrate judge is not a District Court Judge.
Magistrate judges are an inferior level. Unlike federal district judges, they are not appointed by the President of the United States with the advise and consent of the US Senate and they do not have their jobs for life. Rather, magistrate judges are appointed by the sitting District Court judges in a particular district for a specific number of years. Their function is to assist the district court judges with the more routine judicial duties, usually including - as in this instance - criminal arraignments.
When a case - either civil or criminal - is commenced in a federal District Court, it is (supposedly) assigned at random to one District Court Judge and one Magistrate Judge. A legitimate question in the Czarnaev case is was Magistrate Judge Bowler assigned randomly or was she assigned deliberately, in view of her dubious personal background, so as to Mirandize the defendant before the FBI interrogation could be completed.
http://www.usukraine.org/openworld-ukraine-boston-delegation.shtml
Ukrainian Judges Visit Boston
(snip)
The U.S. Congress established Open World in 1999 to enhance understanding and capabilities for cooperation between the United States and Russia. In 2003, Congress made all post-Soviet states eligible for the program. Open World promotes partnerships and continued communications between delegates and their American hosts and professional counterparts.
The delegation was then off for Boston, where they experienced a very full 8 day professional and cultural program.
The program’s hosting judge in Boston was Marianne B. Bowler, U.S. Magistrate Judge of the District of Massachusetts. The delegates were also joined by U.S.-Ukraine Foundation Vice President John A. Kun during their Boston visit.
(snip)
The program concluded with ceremony and reception held at a restaurant located in Boston’s Old City Hall in downtown Boston. The Ukrainian judges each received a certificate of completion and a keepsake of Boston. The U.S.-Ukraine Foundation also presented Judge Marianne Bowler with an award for her outstanding leadership in volunteerism in planning the professional program, securing venues and arranging for the many speakers to participate.
https://www.facebook.com/openworldleadershipcenter2/posts/10151468270212670
Russian spy suspects hastily sent to New York amid reports US-Russia spy swap developing
Published July 07, 2010
(snip)
U.S. Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler said the hearing, which lasted barely a minute, was convened “on rather short notice.”