Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Approves Bill to End Airport Delays (9-1 vote!)
realclearpolitics ^ | 4/26/13 | Espo

Posted on 04/26/2013 12:56:49 PM PDT by pabianice

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Congress easily approved legislation Friday ending furloughs of air traffic controllers that have delayed hundreds of flights daily, infuriating travelers and causing political headaches for lawmakers.

The House approved the measure on a 361-41 vote, a day after the Senate swiftly agreed to the bill. The vote came as lawmakers prepared to leave town for a weeklong spring recess, a break that would have been less pleasant if they were confronted by constituents upset over travel delays.

Republicans accused the Obama administration of purposely furloughing controllers to pressure Congress to lift $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts - known as the sequester - that took effect last month at government agencies.

"The administration has played shameful politics with the sequester at the cost of hard-working American families," said Rep. Tom Latham, R-Iowa...

Officials estimate it would cost slightly more than $200 million to restore air traffic controllers to full staffing, and an additional $50 million to keep open smaller air traffic towers around the country that the FAA has proposed closing.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
$200M out of $85B = two-tenths of one percent. A real budget-buster.
1 posted on 04/26/2013 12:56:49 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This is not new money it would only allow the FAA to shift money for its budget to pay for it.


2 posted on 04/26/2013 1:02:38 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I see they’re now closing gauging stations right at the start of flood season.


3 posted on 04/26/2013 1:03:35 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Right...this allowed the Dems to “save face” over what was going to become a scandal for them.


4 posted on 04/26/2013 1:11:18 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Why not Close the White house totally and send 0 back to his home in Chicago!
HE can party with Ayers and eat BBQ! Moochell can fly back to Spain with her brats in tow!


5 posted on 04/26/2013 1:29:13 PM PDT by Conserev1 ("Still Clinging to my Bible and my Weapon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: what's up

BS.


6 posted on 04/26/2013 2:08:03 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Don't know why it's BS.

I was agreeing with your point that the legislation merely shifted funds. The Dems agreed to it so fast because they knew they were running into public opinion trouble on the flight delays despite their attempt to blame Repubs.

7 posted on 04/26/2013 2:13:53 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
This adds to my point. The Dems lost their battle to blame Repubs on this. Today's bill isn't what they wanted; they want to get the whole sequester revoked, not solve the FAA issue by shifting funds.

The only reason they did it this time is they were losing on public opinion on an issue that was supposed to be theirs.

W.H. warns against piecemeal sequester fixes

8 posted on 04/26/2013 2:23:43 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This is very good. The sequester will force the government to allocate funds to truly important things and take away money from wasteful programs. Let’s have more sequesters.


9 posted on 04/26/2013 2:52:13 PM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Would you be in favor of repealing obamacare prior to the Nov 2014 election?


10 posted on 04/26/2013 3:20:01 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Sure but what does that have to do with this story?


11 posted on 04/26/2013 4:04:14 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: what's up

If we repeal it, wouldn’t we be allowing the Dems to “save face” over what was going to become a scandal for them?


12 posted on 04/26/2013 4:45:28 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Somehow I don't think the Dems are going to be rushing to repeal Obamacare to save face anytime soon like they did with this bill.

And the Repubs didn't pass this bill to help the Dems...they did it to a problem fixed as quickly as possible. The Dems' motives are different.

13 posted on 04/26/2013 5:42:22 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I'll be willing to bet $10 to a doughnut that when delays continue AFTER this move is implemented and you ASK WHY there are continued delays you'll hear ( crickets ).
14 posted on 04/26/2013 5:51:51 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson