” - - - That’s why I’ve offered my information/evidence to any journalist who is willing to take it and run with it. But nobody will. “
I like to follow CommieBlaster - they get good latest, easy to read etc.
It seemed to me that lately they HAD gotten your stuff !?
They switched to a different format and were showing the HISTORY of birther things - chronological exposes, news, etc
It now has it ALL there - easy to clic on links, Pics, et al.
(does everyone know about this site? should we promote it?)
I should have said that other blogs have done a fantastic job of picking up on the evidence that I and others have posted. We’re all kind of in the same boat though; because we aren’t the “establishment media” there are large swatches of the country who don’t think we’re credible.
It’s an amazing thing - that TPM Muckraker censored out the critical part of Ken Bennett’s request for a letter of verification - the actual application form - and yet the media all over has reported the story as that yellow journalist presented it AND WOULD NOT EVEN MENTION the entire request after I published it on my blog. And that’s American Thinker, which would publish opinions about the importance of the eligibility issue. I had the documents from Ken Bennett’s own office, after Tom Ballantyne did a FOIA request for me. And yet the FACT of the request and the laws that govern the responses to the request were not considered credible enough to print, by the “respected” media. How do you get more credible than original sources, with provenance easily documented? Tom and Gabor Zolna actually went and photographed Bennett’s letter of verification for me as well. I can’t yet report on that, for strategic reasons, but that is how genuine the information is. Why is that not considered credible enough to report?
The blogs have been great, and are doing the country a great service. I cannot thank them enough, just for being who they are, which is why they do what they do.
The “respected” media, not so much.