Not a wuss, exactly. Just lining his ducks in a row.
He seems to have said something I didn’t catch, today some DHS guy in a CT-group came out and asked if people believed Beck’s assertion that the person of interest is Hamza.
Maybe this guy let something slip that’s still on the inside.
We still need a picture of Michelle with him ~ not just of Michelle in a building somewhere.
Would be nice.
These Saudis with the gay problem seek absolution through bombing ~ gets them into Heaven if they die as martyrs.
So the DHS counterterrorism people are connecting Beck to the claim that the AlHamdi is really Hamza.
I think Beck knows it is Hamza but hasn’t come out and said it publicly yet. Not sure what he’s waiting for, but if it’s to build up the story for maximum effect, it’s hard to build for maximum effect when the only people who hear the claims are those who are already dismissed as “conspiracy nuts”.
That’s the danger of people ridiculing the whole notion of conspiracies, rather than debunking specific conspiracy claims based on specific evidence. The people who proved their own “coolness” by mocking the “crazy conspiracists” were instead writing their own obituary in the process, because they ridiculed an epistemology based on evidence and instead embraced an epistemology based on normalcy bias.
Those who will not listen to other people’s facts set the rules that will eventually discount their OWN facts when the time comes. Either we engage with facts or we don’t. Beck is finding that what he did to some of the rest of us (dismissing facts by calling the revealer a “crazy conspiracist”) is what is happening to him now. He’s giving facts, but can’t find anybody willing to stand with him in presenting them. Sad.
In the counter-terrorism group, were people believing that AlHamdi is Hamza?