Posted on 04/27/2013 11:56:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
The interminable war on drilling, fracking and the Keystone XL pipeline has taken some bizarre turns. Now its getting worse, as opponents grow more desperate, and the moon again grows full.
Deep water drilling, 3-D and 4-D seismic (the ability to visualize 3-D over many years), deep horizon horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, and other technological marvels have obliterated environmentalist claims that the United States and world are running out of oil and gas and therefore we need to switch to subsidized, land-hungry, job-killing wind turbines, solar panels and biofuels.
Thanks to free enterprise innovation on state and public lands and no thanks to President Obama, who has made nearly the entire federal onshore and offshore estate off limits to leasing and drilling US oil and natural gas production has hit an all-time record. The world is on the verge of doing so as well.
Long-running geopolitics have been turned upside down, as OPEC, Russia and other oil superpowers wonder what hit them. Plastic and chemical manufacturers, steel makers, bus and fleet vehicle operators, and now long-haul truckers are already cashing in on the natural gas bonanza. So are electric utilities, especially with EPA continuing its war on coal, with more unnecessary heavy-handed air and water rules.
Global warming/climate change hysteria is also floundering on the rocks of reality. Average global temperatures havent risen in 16 years, seas arent rising any faster than 100 years ago, and storms, floods and droughts are no more frequent or severe than over multi-decade trends during the past century.
Evidence and reality simply are not cooperating with IPCC and Mann-made climate models. Trust the computer models! the alarmists plead. If reality doesnt comport with our predictions, reality is wrong.
The U.S. State Department has (yet again) said the Keystone XL pipeline poses few environmental problems and should be approved, to bring Canadian oil sands petroleum to Texas refineries creating thousands of construction and permanent jobs, and billions in economic growth and government revenue.
Unacceptable! Rants the Environmental Protection Agency. State underestimated KXLs potential impact on global warming and needs to do its studies all over again, says EPA. Never mind that oil sands production would add a minuscule 0.06% to US greenhouse gas emissions and an undetectable 0.00001 degrees C per year to computer-modeled global warming, according to the Congressional Research Service. Do it over, until you get the answers we want, demand EPA and environmentalist ideologues.
Some 70% of Americans and 60% of Canadians support Keystone and energy security (and jobs) outrank greenhouse gas reduction as a national priority by a 2-1 margin among Americans says Canadian pollster Nik Nanos.
However, the haters of hydrocarbons, modern living standards, free enterprise and personal liberty are not ready to surrender. Theyve launched a blitzkrieg flanking attack. This time they are outraged that some Keystone oil could be refined into diesel and other products and exported! to Europe or Asia while some frack-based natural gas might be converted to LNG and likewise exported! around the globe.
Well, yes. When US refiners transform crude oil into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, heating oil, asphalt, waxes and petrochemicals, they ship some of these products overseas. Since Americans use less diesel than refineries manufacture (some parts of each barrel of crude can be converted only into diesel), refiners also export their excess diesel to Europe, which uses more diesel than gasoline, and Europeans ship their surplus gasoline to the USA, mostly to East Coast consumers. Its a win-win arrangement that will be buttressed and safeguarded by Keystone pipeline transport of Canadian oil.
And yes, Cheniere Energy and other companies want to ship liquefied natural gas to foreign markets. Its hardly surprising that anti-fracking activists would seize on this as yet another excuse for opposing this game-changing technology. It is hardly remarkable that Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) and other far-Left legislators would sponsor bills to block LNG exports.
What is shocking is that Dow and Huntsman Chemical, Alcoa Aluminum, Nucor Steel and other companies are joining the no-export campaign. They have convinced themselves that such exports will hurt their own selfish economic interests and for PR have packaged that notion into assertions that exporting any US natural gas is against Americas and the publics economic interests. Nonsense.
America has barely begun to tap its vast shale gas and conventional natural gas deposits. It has not yet touched its methane hydrates. Together, these deposits will likely last a century or more. In addition, other countries are racing to develop their own conventional, shale and hydrate deposits while other nations will eventually recognize the folly of keeping their own deposits off limits. All this will gradually reduce demand for US natural gas exports, slow and prolong them, and keep gas prices low.
This interplay will also help ensure that more factories and power plants in more countries burn natural gas, thereby replacing coal and providing the economic wherewithal to enable China, India and other nations to install modern pollution abatement technologies on their now dirty power plants. That will greatly improve air quality and human health in countless cities, while reducing carbon dioxide emissions and reducing consternation among steadily dwindling numbers of climate alarmists.
American oil and gas development and exports will also provide an opportunity for our nation to give back to the world community for all the petroleum that our anti-leasing, anti-drilling policies have caused us to take from other nations and the world at large for decades. All this activity will also spur further innovation in technologies to unlock still more energy. It will spur job creation, economic growth and government tax and royalty revenue collection here in the United States and abroad.
More than 23 million Americans are still unemployed or underemployed; 47 million are on food stamps, 128 million dependent on various government programs; the United States is more than $16 trillion in debt. Unemployment in the construction trades is 14.7 percent. Black unemployment was 12.7% when President Bush left office; it soared to 16.7% by September 2011 under President Obama, and remains stuck at 14% today for black adults and an astronomical 43% for black teenagers!
Drilling, fracking and exports can reverse these horrendous, intolerable, unnecessary statistics.
Misguided industrialists should stop railing against exports. They would do themselves and our nation far more good by putting their lobbyists and public relations staffs to work demanding an end to leasing, drilling and fracking bans that continue to dominate progressive thinking, US energy policy (especially under the current administration), and attitudes in California, New York and too many other states.
Of 1.8 billion acres on our nations Outer Continental Shelf, only 36-43 million are under lease. Thats barely 2% of the OCS. Offshore territory equal to 78% of the entire US landmass (Alaska plus the Lower 48) is off limits! Even the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill cannot justify that.
Onshore, its just as bad. As of 1994, over 410 million federally controlled acres were effectively off limits to exploration and development. Thats 62% of the nations public lands an area nearly equal to Arizona, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming combined. The situation has gotten progressively worse, with millions more acres and vast energy, mineral and economic bounties locked up in wilderness, park, preserve, wildlife refuge, wilderness study, Antiquities Act and other restrictive land use designations, or simply made unavailable by bureaucratic fiat or foot-dragging.
Drilling opponents claim to be protecting the environment, but in reality simply detest hydrocarbons, modern living standards, free enterprise and personal liberty. Commonsense policies will rejuvenate our economy, put Americans back to work, and help fund government programs that Messrs. Obama and Reid profess to care so much about while safeguarding ecological values we all cherish.
Fungible: A good or asset's interchangeability with other individual goods/assets of the same type.
As, outside the Middle East, new drillings are more and more expensive, OPEC is now earning 5 times more money than in the 90s.
Outside the Middle East, new drillings are around 10 times more expensive than drillings in the Middle East.
In 2011, the marginal cost of oil production - the cost of production for the most expensive new fields - was $92.26 a barrel for the 50 largest listed oil and gas companies.
According to Bernstein’s energy analysts, the marginal cost of oil production will reach $100 a barrel in the near future.
The most expensive oil fields essentially set the floor of oil prices, worldwide.
So, OPEC is likely to earn $1 trillion in 2013 (as in 2010 and 2011) per year versus $200 billion per year between 1985 and 2002 (Today’s Dollars).
The lefty enviros would like us to all exist like the characters in Glenn Beck’s new book, “Agenda 21”.
Deep water drilling, 3-D and 4-D seismic (the ability to visualize 3-D over many years), deep horizon horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, and other technological marvels have obliterated environmentalist claims that the United States and world are running out of oil and gas and therefore we need to switch to subsidized, land-hungry, job-killing wind turbines, solar panels and biofuels.
When you can get this report from the US Geological Survey:
The Green River Formation: World's Largest Oil Shale Deposits www.thenewamerican.com Sci/Tech Energy May 15, 2012 USGS [U.S. Geological Survey] estimates that the Green River Formation contains about 3 trillion barrels of oil, and about half of this may be recoverable with today's technology....and the world's current known total oil reserves are about 1 Trillion barrels.
As a country that has 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, but uses 20 percent of the world's oil I'm going to repeat that we've got 2 percent of the world oil reserves; we use 20 percent. What that means is, as much as we're doing to increase oil production, we're not going to be able to just drill our way out of the problem of high gas prices. Anybody who tells you otherwise either doesnt know what theyre talking about or they arent telling you the truth.
President Obama, speech in North Carolina, March 7, 2012
all that is required is motivating the wackos by an offer they dare not refuse.
Envirothugs are watching all their Marxist dreams go up in a natural gas plume.
OPEC is, unfortunately, going to continue to be making a lot of money for many years.
Its primary political, as opposed to economic, clout was based on the potential of shutting off the spigot.
And they’re in the process of losing that power.
"The technology for pulling gas from deep shale, refined in the 1990's in Texas, has since spread to other "plays"-parts of a shale basin where large quantities of gas have been found. More than a third of U.S. gas now comes from shale."....Great article.
[Snip]
America has barely begun to tap its vast shale gas and conventional natural gas deposits. It has not yet touched its methane hydrates. Together, these deposits will likely last a century or more. In addition, other countries are racing to develop their own conventional, shale and hydrate deposits while other nations will eventually recognize the folly of keeping their own deposits off limits. All this will gradually reduce demand for US natural gas exports, slow and prolong them, and keep gas prices low.
Which is why it is not allowed. I have yet to see an environmental program that did not consume MORE energy in the short term. Solar cells take decades to pay for the energy to produce them. Recycling requires massive amounts of cleaning, trucking, material handling, and processing. Even "green" alternatives to cement are energy intensive.
People write this stuff and still can't put the first paragraph together with the second to see why the biggest funding sources for environmentalists are the tax-exempt foundations belonging to the major stockholders of petrochemical corporations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.