Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BCTGM 'Extremely Disappointed' by Reports Hostess Brands Buyer Will Not Hire Union Members
AFL-CIO ^ | 4/26/2013 | Jackie Tortora

Posted on 04/27/2013 2:25:51 PM PDT by mdittmar

Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers (BCTGM) issued a statement today, responding to the sale of the iconic Twinkies brand.
 
In response to Metropoulos & Co. CEO C. Dean Metropoulos' statement to The Wall Street Journal that the company will not hire union workers when reopening four former Hostess Brands bakeries, BCTGM International President David B. Durkee issued the following statement on behalf of all BCTGM members:

The BCTGM is pleased to see that Hostess Brands LLC, the newly formed snack cake company created by Apollo Global Management and Metropoulos & Co, has announced that it will be reopening four Hostess bakeries to produce the iconic Hostess cake brands. Those four successful cake plants were represented by the BCTGM for many years under former Hostess ownership.

However, we are extremely disappointed to see negative statements from company executives about the union status of its future employees. Ideally, we would like to see as many of our members hired as possible. We believe their combination of experience, dedication and know-how will give the new owners the chance to get high quality snack cakes back in the marketplace.

Federal labor law governing the hiring process and the obligations for the employer and the rights of the future employees in this situation is quite definitive. We expect that the new owners will respect the statutory rights of all workers during the hiring, startup and future of this new company.

The BCTGM remains focused on ensuring that the new Hostess Brands ownership understands that the snack cakes at the center of this new company are inextricably linked to the hands that make them—and have made them for generations. We know that our workers have a critical role to play in protecting and enhancing some of America’s most valuable consumer brands. We all want the same outcome: that the brands should prosper and endure. This is what the next stage of this saga is all about—implementing a new ownership and manufacturing structure worthy of the brands themselves and America’s manufacturing prowess.

Our members provide immense value to the new ownership with decades of experience, expertise and training. Not only have our members produced these quality products for consumers for generations, they know these bakeries inside and out. Our members are eager and willing to return to these snack plants and help usher in a new period of prosperity for Hostess snack cakes. 

It is our sincere hope that the new owners will fully recognize the tremendous value of hiring back our members. If, however, they do not want us as part of the future of this company, we will continue to fight for our membership through other avenues.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hostess; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: ConradofMontferrat

“Wanna bet David B. Durkee lives in a half million dollar mansion and has a paid driver and vacations on Martha’s Vinyard?”

A half a million dollar house is hardly a mansion. The median where I live is $625,000.00.

.


81 posted on 04/27/2013 4:53:19 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I am sure Hostess would welcome back the employees -—as long as they drop their membership in the unions that destroyed their predecesser.

Getting bit by a rattlesnake does not mean they should hire that rattlesnake again.

The Union is threatening to rape this company before it even gets started.


82 posted on 04/27/2013 5:05:33 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Oh Well Golly Jeez BooBooBoo to you too! I don’t live in those UPSCALE states.

I’m just a po boy, pig farmer from the backwash of PA and live in da Burgh, half million dollar house here IS a mansion.

Just messing with you.

But, you ARE correct, in many cities 500K ain’t doodly.

And I’ll bet ol Davy Boy’s house is just right up there with the Jones’s and the Rockefeller’s and the Pelosie’s.

And dumb screw union workers will hammer the company owner who may not live as rich as their union thug boss.

You get the point.


83 posted on 04/27/2013 5:12:42 PM PDT by ConradofMontferrat (According to mudslymz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

Public employee unions are even far worse because the customers are forced taxpayers and management is bought and paid politicians


84 posted on 04/27/2013 5:14:19 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

“You get the point.”


I certainly do.

For what it’s worth we bought a 3 BR house in 1960 in the same town and paid $12,000.00,which is less than I paid for my last compact car.

.


85 posted on 04/27/2013 6:10:23 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Thanks for the support!


86 posted on 04/27/2013 6:23:58 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head
If they’re TRULY worried about all these experienced bakers and other skilled workers, they’d let them get rehired as NON-union so they could regain their job.

Dollars to donuts (or sugary snack cakes), quite a few former union members will be applying as non-union. Such is the case with forced union membership operations - people join only because they have to in order to get the job. Otherwise, they'd likely have avoided union membership.

I worked in a closed-shop union outfit for 11 years. Never really liked the union or what they stood for, but I tolerated it in order to collect a reasonable paycheck.

87 posted on 04/27/2013 6:24:51 PM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

He has two house from what I have found. Don’t know what they look like though.


88 posted on 04/27/2013 6:33:08 PM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

J. T. quote: “When I’m not tweeting about America’s unions... I’m on my knees, sucking up to them.”


89 posted on 04/27/2013 6:50:27 PM PDT by wetgundog (" Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is no Vice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I just don’t understand. What compassionate company would balk at paying a truck-driver $135,000 a year in salary and benefits?


90 posted on 04/27/2013 6:52:58 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

They are where they are because of these union fools - why would they want to hire them back?


91 posted on 04/27/2013 6:59:52 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

3 Wintergarden Court
    Olney, MD 20832

Owner: DAVID B DURKEE & L S DURKEE
Total land value: $180,000
Total value for property: $382,860
Total assessed value for property: $382,860
Base area of building: 1,452 square feet
Number of stories: 2
Air conditioning: yes
Number of fireplace stacks: 1
Date of current assessment: 09/2008
Year property was built: 1992

http://www.city-data.com/montgomery-county/W/Wintergarden-Court-1.html#ixzz2RifNhuXJ


92 posted on 04/27/2013 7:02:43 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

Durkee and his wife, Sharon, maintain a home in both Evansville and in Olney, Md


93 posted on 04/27/2013 7:05:25 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

http://www.bctrustfunds.org/images/2011_SUMMARY_ANNUAL_REPORT_health_benefits_.pdf


94 posted on 04/27/2013 7:14:11 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

When they are available again, I may just have to start buying a package a week, though I would have to give them to the local food pantry, since I need to start limiting my sweet intake. I’d do this to help the company keep going and continue to be free . . .


95 posted on 04/27/2013 7:30:32 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Let’s see...if I could hire non-union workers instead of union workers...doesn’t seem like a very difficult decision.


96 posted on 04/27/2013 7:58:34 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
We believe their combination of experience, dedication and know-how

Guess they shouldn't have threatened a strike. Sort of throws "dedication" right out the window.

97 posted on 04/28/2013 3:00:01 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Maybe they can eat some Twinkies - it might make them feel better to have a little comfort food.


98 posted on 04/28/2013 5:24:47 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
The new Hostess is firing up plants in Columbus, Ga.; Emporia, Kan.; Schiller Park, Ill.; and Indianapolis, Ind. It's also considering whether to reopen a fifth plant it purchased, in Los Angeles. (from a different article)

so 3 of the 5 are in right to work states...they should move the Ill plant and forget about the Los Angeles plant altogether....or perhaps move the equipment to NV or AZ.

99 posted on 04/28/2013 5:48:13 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight,, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

LOL right you are.


100 posted on 04/29/2013 4:05:44 AM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson