Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Slide show at link, if my attempt at HTML doesn't work in the article posting.
1 posted on 04/29/2013 6:30:03 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Who designed/built that plant? The Japanese themselves? The US...the Brits...the Germans? Certainly not the Soviets or the Chinese.


2 posted on 04/29/2013 6:32:30 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Leno Was Right,They *Are* Undocumented Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Sometimes you just don’t know what to believe.


3 posted on 04/29/2013 6:36:02 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
If they had better batteries this would have gone down in history as a great success story.

They should have had priority access to helicopters and backup batteries.

They withstood a gigantic earthquake IMMEDIATELY followed by a huge tsunami, and ALMOST survived it, intact.

This would have been huge boost to nuclear power, if only they had more backup batteries.

And maybe not putting it right next to a tsunami flood zone would have been a good idea too

5 posted on 04/29/2013 6:36:59 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I don’t trust the experts that wrote this report as far as I could throw the plant.


6 posted on 04/29/2013 6:41:59 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Interesting story but seems to be a case of no matter how bad things were thank goodness they weren’t worse.


10 posted on 04/29/2013 6:52:34 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Moreover, molten fuel almost certainly flowed through steel reactor vessels and is now believed to be residing inside concrete containment buildings, where it may have to remain for years...

... EXACTLY AS DESIGNED AND INTENDED. The point is that it will REMAIN there, unlike the millions of tons of toxic waste spewed into the environment by coal power plants every single year.

It's like anthropogenic climate change zealots - their models are proven wrong, their predictions are contradicted by observation, and yet they cling desperately to the idea that we're dooooomed, doomed I tell you!

"Look!" they shriek, "two extra people might get cancer someday!!! We must shut down all nuclear power plants now!!"

14 posted on 04/29/2013 7:15:30 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Interesting, so it sounds like the usual gloom and doomers were all hot air, as usual. Good on the engineers who built the power plant.

I liked the following quote...study predicted there will still be between 15 and 1,300 cancer fatalities worldwide....

First...."worldwide"? Really? 15 more deaths out of 7 billion? Second, two orders of magnitude is a pretty big range. Truly, this shows how worthless the "science" is on this - or how worthless the reporter is if they managed to get the facts wrong.

17 posted on 04/29/2013 7:27:49 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Bump for later


28 posted on 04/29/2013 1:07:30 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson