[Resettozero]

Don't know what you are asking me. Are you suggesting what he did was fine? Are you suggesting that “conservative” adulterors should get a pass as long as they are running against a liberal?

Was just wondering about your interest in S.C.'s 1st Cong. Dist. race (Charleston) from up there in N.H.

And while you're trying to put words in my mouth regarding adulterers getting a pass, try this answer on for size: It's folks like you on FR that cannot see the plank in their own eyes. Sure, stone Sanford and stone him again, if you are qualified.

[Durus]

Here at FR we comment on elections that we might not be able to vote on in person all of the time. If that bothers you that's unfortunate.

I don't expect perfection from candidates as no one is perfect. I don't expect 100% ideological purity. That being said there are some imperfections I can't over look. I will not vote for anyone that supports infringing upon my rights as explained in the 2nd amendment. I also will not vote for an adulterer though for a very simple reason. If they will break their oath to their spouse for mere sexual gratification, then there is no doubt in my mind that they will betray their oath of office for any number of reasons.