Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
the issue is about the attack

which explains why Dershowitz is recommending that the defense move to have the NEN call barred.

31 posted on 05/01/2013 7:42:04 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
-- which explains why Dershowitz is recommending that the defense move to have the NEN call barred. --

Is that a recent Dershowitz remark?

I think it's a good defense strategy, to limit the jury inquiry to the time after Zimmerman hung up with NEN. Everything he did up to then was legal and not provocative in a legal sense, meaning, nothing he did would justify taking a blow.

I don't see Nelson limiting the case thusly, because it cuts the state off from presenting its case. I also imagine Nelson will allow all fashion of bogus legal theories to be presented as though they have validity. For example, the "Zimmerman could have prevented this by staying in his truck," and "asking a person what they are doing is sufficient justification for them to punch you."

There will be a flurry of pretrial motions on admissibility of evidence, and she'll rule on them before the jury is seated to hear opening arguments.

32 posted on 05/01/2013 7:50:10 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson