Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas SOC response to Eric Holder
Kansas Secretary of State ^ | 5/2/2013 | Kris W. Koback

Posted on 05/03/2013 2:11:56 PM PDT by JohnKinAK

Excerpts:

“On April 26, 2013, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to Kansas Governor Brownback concerning SB 102, the Second Amendment Protection Act. In that letter, Holder declares SB 102 to be unconstitutional and suggests that federal officials will disregard it. Holder’s understanding of the United States Constitution is incorrect.

As one of the co-authors of SB 102 and a former professor of constitutional law, I ensured that it was drafted to withstand any legal challenge. SB 102 states that a firearm that is assembled in Kansas, that is stamped “Made in Kansas,” and that never leaves the State of Kansas is not subject to regulation by the federal government. It was drafted with the intent to assert Kansas’s authority as a co-equal sovereign under the United States Constitution to regulate a matter that is outside Congress’s jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Clause of Article I, Section 8. It was also drafted to stave off unconstitutional legislation pending in Congress that not only infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of Kansas Citizens, but also exceeds Congress’s constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.”

"With respect to his concern that federal officials be allowed to enforce federal laws, Mr. Holder’s statement is a curious one. He was evidently not concerned that ATFE officials be allowed to enforce federal law when his agency oversaw the “fast and furious” operation to walk guns into the hands of Mexican cartels.

The State of Kansas is determined to restore the Constitution and to protect the right of its citizens to keep and bear arms."

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kansas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Kansas tells Holder to stick it, full letter at link
1 posted on 05/03/2013 2:11:57 PM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

I like it. No punches pulled, basically called Holder a criminal with no authority to be telling anyone else anything.


2 posted on 05/03/2013 2:12:58 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

the states, it seems to my, could use this model to interpose their authority between the people and the feds very effectively in a wide rage of activities.


3 posted on 05/03/2013 2:18:12 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK
With respect to his concern that federal officials be allowed to enforce federal laws, Mr. Holder’s statement is a curious one. He was evidently not concerned that ATFE officials be allowed to enforce federal law when his agency oversaw the “fast and furious” operation to walk guns into the hands of Mexican cartels.

Well, yeah, but I'm sure those cartels contributed millions of dollars to President You Didn't Build That's reelection campaign, so it was okay.

4 posted on 05/03/2013 2:21:16 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Hopefully Sheriff Arpaio will go to Kansas, arrest this man, bring him to AZ and have him sentenced to a minimum of 4 years as Governor.


5 posted on 05/03/2013 2:21:35 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Wish our governor and atty general would write an identical letter.


6 posted on 05/03/2013 2:22:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK


7 posted on 05/03/2013 2:25:32 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Like use of federal lands for starters.

States need to ‘repatriate’ control over so called ‘federal land’. Ask Nevada about that one. AZ to but to a lesser extent.


8 posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:27 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

WTF? Who are you talking about?


9 posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:36 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Selective enforcement of which Federal laws you will support
is a violation of your sworn oath to support the Constitution .

It is sorta like : being ‘a little-bit pregnant’
You either are , .. or are not


10 posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:37 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ("Political correctness is tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

It was a joke man....


11 posted on 05/03/2013 2:29:19 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Oooops, sorry. I read the last word again.. ‘Governor’.. LOL Not happy with Jan Brewer?


12 posted on 05/03/2013 2:30:14 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Awesome response, simply awesome.


13 posted on 05/03/2013 2:31:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

He should’ve mentioned ‘DOMA’ too.. Another Federal Law which 0bama stated specifically he would not enforce.


14 posted on 05/03/2013 2:31:29 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

50 50. She tends to help Obama more than fight him. But she has done more good than many.


15 posted on 05/03/2013 2:31:33 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Great link
I am betting on Kansas

has any other admin been so hell bent on suing and interferring with states rights?


16 posted on 05/03/2013 2:32:08 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Since the New Deal the states have agreed to act more or less like bureaus of the central government rather than individual and separately constituted political entities.


17 posted on 05/03/2013 2:32:10 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Kansas to Holder, “Get Bent.”


18 posted on 05/03/2013 2:32:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Yup. Thus many of the current problems.


19 posted on 05/03/2013 2:33:13 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


20 posted on 05/03/2013 2:35:22 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson