Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BO Stinkss

Sounds bogus to me. Not a terrorist, but a minor criminal punk, I’d guess.


3 posted on 05/06/2013 11:35:56 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

Most certainly not a terrorist. Probably some personal grudge. Maybe drug-related.

This is southern Minnesota farm country, not the northwoods that appeals to anti-government types.

Only called ‘terrorist’ to pad the white Christian male stats.


8 posted on 05/06/2013 11:43:21 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Sounds bogus to me. Not a terrorist, but a minor criminal punk, I’d guess.

That's how I read it too. Consider this, the Feds still haven't been able to guess at what the Boston bombers motivation was, but in this case they are certain the individual was motivated to be a terrorist.

As you said, it sounds like they caught a petty criminal with a few items that go bang. And what was the armored vehicle needed for? They likely could have just waited for him to walk out his door and then cuff him in a routine arrest.

I read this as a sign that the Feds are making a case much larger than this one felon.

30 posted on 05/06/2013 12:49:55 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson