Posted on 05/06/2013 12:28:39 PM PDT by Kaslin
I’m conflicted. More and more people get lured into some form of government dependency every year, and this suggests Americans eventually will adopt a European-style moocher mentality.
This worries me.
On the other hand, I periodically see polls suggesting that the American people have very libertarian views on key issues.
These are encouraging numbers. And here’s another bit of good news. A recent poll by Fox News found that a plurality of Americans would not give up personal freedoms to reduce the threat of terrorism. What’s especially remarkable is that this poll took place immediately following the bombing of the Boston Marathon by the welfare-sponging Tsarnaev brothers.
Interestingly, I had a conversation with a left-leaning friend who said this poll showed that Americans were a bunch of “paranoid nuts” because this poll showed that they viewed their government with suspicion.
But perhaps people are simply rational. I had an intern look up data on the probability of getting killed by a terrorist. He found an article from Reason that reported.
…a rough calculation suggests that in the last five years, your chances of being killed by a terrorist are about one in 20 million. This compares annual risk of dying in a car accident of 1 in 19,000; drowning in a bathtub at 1 in 800,000; dying in a building fire at 1 in 99,000; or being struck by lightning at 1 in 5,500,000.
In other words, the odds of being killed by a terrorist are very low. And with the risk so low, why give up liberty? Particularly when it’s highly unlikely that sacrificing more of your freedom will actually reduce the already-low threat of terrorism.
This reminds me of the money laundering issue. Just a few decades ago, there was no such thing as anti-money laundering laws. Then politicians decided we need these laws to reduce crime.
These laws, we were told, would give law enforcement more tools to catch bad guys and also reduce the incentive to commit crimes since it would be harder for criminals to enjoy their ill-gotten gains.
That sounds good, but the evidence shows that these laws have become very expensive and intrusive, yet they’ve had no measurable impact on crime rates.
So how did politicians respond? In a stereotypical display of Mitchell’s Law, they decided to make anti-money laundering laws more onerous, imposing ever-higher costs in hopes of having some sort of positive impact.
This is bad for banks, bad for the poor, and bad for the economy.
So when I see polls showing the American people are skeptical about surrendering freedom to the government, I don’t think they are being “paranoid.” I think they’re being very rational.
I’ve written before about the remarkable vitality of Hong Kong and Singapore, two jurisdictions that deserve praise for small government and free markets.
Pretending to be a jet-setter in Monaco
I have also praised Switzerland because of policies such as genuine federalism and financial privacy, and it goes without saying that I admire tax havens such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman Islands
I’m a big fan of Estonia, which has made big strides thanks to the flat tax and other free market reforms.
Australia also is one of my favorite nations, in part because of its privatized Social Security system.
Even Canada and Sweden have earned my praise for recent economic reforms.
But here’s a video, produced by the folks at The Fund for American Studies, that identifies an even more impressive economic miracle.
I did guess the country in the video, but only a few seconds before the narrator spilled the beans. My excuse is that I watched early on Sunday morning, when civilized people should still be asleep.
But allow me to atone for my slowness by adding a very important point about growth. The country in the video became successful because it enjoyed a very long period of decent growth. But that has recently changed for the worse.
And things got worse when statists were in power, as even the Washington Post has acknowledged.
The lesson to be learned is that even small differences in growth can make a big difference over time.
By some measures, Hong Kong and Singapore are now richer than the United States. The simple reason is that those jurisdictions have been enjoying 5 percent-plus growth for decades while the United States economy has struggled to achieve 3 percent growth.
Then again, the United States is more prosperous than most European nations, though that may be an example of damning with faint praise.
It boils down to the basic conundrum of American politics - most Americans are in favor of limited government until it limits what they want government to do.
I get this all the time from the anti-gun commenters on various news sites.
I post a list of anti-gun laws and identify the Democrats proposing them and then lambaste them for trying to get these outrageous laws passed - and when someone yells "Hey wait a minute!", call them "paranoid".
Never hear from 'em again. Besides shutting them up, it reminds the fence-sitters just how off-the-wall the Democrats are.
Paranoid or not, Islamists still want to kill you if they can’t convert you.
Yeah, but the liberals think they will be spared
If Americans were ‘’paranoid’’ there would never have been a Pearl Harbor or 9/11.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.