Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
“compelling evidence”

What? Eye witness testimony???? Even the chief hunters of the Nazi's , the Israeli Supreme Court let Demjanjuk go based on the value of “eyewitness” testimony and the probability that the Soviet's played hi-jinks with identity cards.

I went to my 30 year high school reunion a couple of years ago and you know what? After telling my most fond remembrances of my high school career, I had 2-3 guys tell me I was mistaken about details of stories and even in fact of some of the people that were supposedly involved. I was later proved wrong. Just about as often as my classmates were wrong when relating their most beloved memories.

“Memory is deceptive because it is colorized by today's events” Authored by Albert Einstein but nobody seems to remember exactly when or if.

26 posted on 05/07/2013 1:26:20 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cyman

Yea, there would have to be compelling evidence of something he specifically did or he would have to have been in pretty high leadership, imho. Just being there is not enough.

Trying to convict every hoodwinked foot soldier just because is not a precedent to set, else everyone who has served in the US is at risk if the wrong sorts come to power.


33 posted on 05/07/2013 1:35:13 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson