Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No mention of federal overreach under the 2nd and 10th amendments.

The First Amendment problems with the second bill are mentioned.

1 posted on 05/08/2013 10:06:21 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
The federal government isn't granted general police powers by the Constitution. States retain that power.

/johnny

2 posted on 05/08/2013 10:24:32 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
It is widely acknowledged by lawmakers, including Morris, that the bill is unconstitutional because it violates the Supremacy Clause, which says federal law trumps state law

Absolute crapolla.

Lefties like to think the clause means that the states are totally subservient to the federales. Really gets their panties in a twist when a state stands up to their grossly unconstitutional power grabs.

Domestic police powers reside with the states for the most part.

5 posted on 05/08/2013 10:44:33 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

6 posted on 05/08/2013 11:18:52 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Four gun bills, including one that purposely flouts federal law, are a step closer to becoming law after passing a Senate committee Tuesday. The bills now head to the Senate floor for further debate.

Onoz! Because as we know, the feds are NEVER wrong. (Except if a Republican is president, then all the libs suddenly discover states rights)

7 posted on 05/08/2013 11:51:57 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
It is widely acknowledged by lawmakers, including Morris, that the bill is unconstitutional because it violates the Supremacy Clause...

Then those legislators need to edumacate themselves a bit. The supremacy clause only applies to proper, Constitutional mandates by the feds. The laws the states are moving to nullify are at least arguably unConstitutional. And saying "Take it to SCOTUS" is certainly a ridiculous position, because SCOTUS is actually a portion of one of the parties, and therefore if they rule in favor of that party, their ruling should be viewed as if it were written on toilet paper. In normal civil and criminal trials, they won't let you serve as a juror if you so much as KNOW any of the participants (not necessarily even one of the parties), so how can goobermint employees get more benefit of the doubt, how can they even get the SAME benefit of the doubt, as the man off the street?

8 posted on 05/08/2013 11:58:32 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Similar stuff happening here in Kansas. Leftie editors crapping their Depends about KS “defying” Holder.


9 posted on 05/08/2013 12:05:35 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

For those that might not know, “nola.com” and “The Times-Picayune” are the New Orleans-area leftist, liberal rags.

New Orleans is about as gun-friendly as Chicago! The police chief, at the time of Katrina, declared a house-to-house search and seizure of any and all firearms, and arrest of those who resisted - even the legal gun owners - with the help of the National Guard (which was NOT the LA National Guard, if you check the videos).

Louisiana is making some headway in pro-gun legislation, and yes, it is the supposed guarantors of the 1st Amendment, that, through their news writings, endeavor to make you, the free American, gun-less.


11 posted on 05/08/2013 12:15:58 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

On a related note, the Oregon Senate tabled four bills which would have added significant burdens to gun owners in that state. It’s possible to revive them but not likely.


12 posted on 05/08/2013 3:40:00 PM PDT by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson