Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heritage study co-author opposed letting in immigrants with low IQs
Washington Post ^ | May 8, 2013 | Dylan Matthews

Posted on 05/08/2013 12:06:21 PM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
I think Richwine makes sense.
1 posted on 05/08/2013 12:06:21 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’m going to tape my fingers together with duct tape so I won’t be banned.


2 posted on 05/08/2013 12:08:18 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America is the root cause of violent crime in Mexico. - Barack Hussein Obama Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This is common sense. Lower IQ people tend to produce less and end up on the public dole more. Of course a nation should desire to limit or even prohibit immigrants that will lessen society.


3 posted on 05/08/2013 12:09:49 PM PDT by NotYourAverageDhimmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yeah, well, that is a good thing.

Who wants to put MORONS in our nation? Seriously.


4 posted on 05/08/2013 12:10:10 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

He has engaged in Thought Crime, thinking something that is true but unpopular.


5 posted on 05/08/2013 12:14:07 PM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotYourAverageDhimmi
I agree. Also no criminals, mentally ill, or those with communicable disease. Furthermore, immigrants should have sponsors so that they would land on welfare. iirc, the Bahamas require that you have a certain amount of wealth before you are admitted.
6 posted on 05/08/2013 12:14:48 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

>>>Who wants to put MORONS in our nation? Seriously.

The Democratic Party. That’s who. More stupid people in America, will mean more Democrats. How else do you expect Hillary Clinton to get elected President in 2016?


7 posted on 05/08/2013 12:15:53 PM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The marginalization of Heritage continues...

Scary is that we have Club for Growth and Americans for Tax Reform pushing this anti-American agenda. People need to let others know that Club for Growth and Americans for Tax Reform are not conservative nor pro-American groups


8 posted on 05/08/2013 12:16:56 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

For decades it has been U.S. policy to not admit people who would become a burden on society, including those with limited mental faculties. It’s written into the law. I’ll try to find the exact wording of the statute.


9 posted on 05/08/2013 12:17:42 PM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity

His train of thought is only unpopular among Liberals, academics, and “elites”. Unfortunately, those groups control the media and schools so they try to brainwash everyone into thinking that un-PC views are unpopular when, in reality, most normal people think those thoughts because they’re correct thoughts.


10 posted on 05/08/2013 12:22:34 PM PDT by NotYourAverageDhimmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Shades of of the Stanford doc, Shockley of the electron chip I think? Of course he was more interested in black skin as opposed to white skin and used intelligence population probability curves for his discourse. He was really given the boot treatment. He would have been better off applying his probability population curve to black vs white baseball, basketball, and baseball players.


11 posted on 05/08/2013 12:25:13 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Tough love.


12 posted on 05/08/2013 12:28:22 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio
For decades it has been U.S. policy to not admit people who would become a burden on society

Can you type stuff like that with a straight face?

We're advertising how to get food stamps in Mexico. We're letting hundreds of 'burdens' into our country every day.

13 posted on 05/08/2013 12:33:15 PM PDT by ladyjane (For the first time in my life I am not proud of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

We have enough low skilled grunt workers to last us 200 years. We should stop all low skilled immigration into America. Good luck getting into Australia, Canada, New Zealand because their immigration is skills based. IOW what can this immigrant do for us? We do the opposite and bring in millions of low IQ low skill legal immigrants simply because they have family over here

85% of our legal immigration is from the 3rd world. They run the immigration show, just look how this bs Amnesty is being pushed.


14 posted on 05/08/2013 12:34:29 PM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing - Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

That’s the Rat voter base.


15 posted on 05/08/2013 12:35:46 PM PDT by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
low-IQ immigrant groups

Easier said -> Democrats.

16 posted on 05/08/2013 12:37:32 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

We aren’t having any trouble growing our own morons!


17 posted on 05/08/2013 12:40:51 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If the democrats produced flower seeds for a garden they would mandate 80% of the seeds be from weeds. Nobody would be allowed to complain about the weeds and nobody would be allowed to rip the weeks out of the garden.

If you dared say anything about the weeds you would be a racist weed-o-phobe.

Play the racist card if you want but this country was on a much better growth path before Ted, the woman killer/molester, Kennedy (may he never rest in peace) changed our immigration laws to give preference to the weeds and reject the productive plants.

You cannot build a great society using turd world people.


18 posted on 05/08/2013 12:41:07 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I’m saying that with a completely straight face. What I said has been official U.S. policy, written into the law. We have an administration that is not enforcing the spirit or the letter of the law.


19 posted on 05/08/2013 12:41:16 PM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Dems made a big deal about Romney’s “47% that don’t pay taxes” statement. Ask yourself as question: What are the odds that people sneaking across the border will be in the 53% of taxpayers?


20 posted on 05/08/2013 12:43:04 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson