Skip to comments.
GOP Sen. Inhofe: Obama Could Be Impeached Over Benghazi 'Cover-Up'
The Hill ^
| 05/10/13 11:22 AM ET
| Jeremy Herb
Posted on 05/10/2013 1:44:35 PM PDT by drewh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
1
posted on
05/10/2013 1:44:35 PM PDT
by
drewh
To: drewh
The Ambassador wasn't just killed....it was a “hit”
2
posted on
05/10/2013 1:47:33 PM PDT
by
M-cubed
To: drewh
‘Not saying impeachment would ever happen, but we need to go for the throat on this one. Expose the regime’s corruption.
3
posted on
05/10/2013 1:47:53 PM PDT
by
Viennacon
To: drewh
It is getting harder and harder for the MSM to ignore comments like this!
4
posted on
05/10/2013 1:49:09 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
To: drewh
sorry ,you need the House ,the Senate and Cahones
5
posted on
05/10/2013 1:49:12 PM PDT
by
molson209
To: drewh
Jay Carney is starting to remind me of Bagdad Bob.
“There are no American Forces at the airport. They’ve all been killed. Thousands of Americans have been slaughtered. Americans have not entered Bagdad. Our forces have been triumphant.......I gotta Go!”
6
posted on
05/10/2013 1:50:03 PM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
("The British are Coming (to confiscate weapons)" - Paul Revere (We know how that ended))
To: ExTexasRedhead
7
posted on
05/10/2013 1:50:13 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: drewh
The I-word seems to be being whispered:
5/10/13 - After examining all the details that emerged on Friday relating to the efforts by members of President Barack Obama's administration to remove references to Islamic terrorism when explaining the reasons behind the 2012 attack on an American consulate in Benghazi, the panel guests on MSNBC's Now agreed that the appearance of a scandal makes the White House "look terrible." One guest even suggested that the controversy could lead to impeachment proceedings against the president.
8
posted on
05/10/2013 1:51:27 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: drewh
9
posted on
05/10/2013 1:52:41 PM PDT
by
slumber1
(Don't taze me bro!)
To: molson209
Here is what I don’t understand about the White House caluculus regarding the attacks. Yes. Zero had stated that Al Qaeda was on the run. He was gloating about Osama. But, for two months prior to his re-election, he could have spun the attacks to his favor. He could be seen as the CIC. He could have actually acted like he was in charge. Instead, he covers up for a silly set of statements that no one really paid any attention to? There is something else much more sinister here.
10
posted on
05/10/2013 1:52:50 PM PDT
by
Galtoid
( .)
To: molson209
Wrong, impeachment happens in the House, the case is then tried in the Senate.
11
posted on
05/10/2013 1:53:39 PM PDT
by
kempster
To: drewh
When Humphries suggested that the Democratic-controlled Senate would not impeach the president I was under the impression that the House impeaches and the Senate tries.
12
posted on
05/10/2013 1:53:46 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
To: drewh
Let the House GOP impeach. Any Senator not voting to convict is political toast
The GOP better not wuss out on this like they did on Eligibility
13
posted on
05/10/2013 1:56:30 PM PDT
by
SeminoleCounty
(GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
To: drewh
Not bloody likely.
Even if the ‘Pubbies hold the House, there are not enough votes for Impeachment to get a “simple majority.”
And the Senate ‘Pubbies would mostly vote with their buddies, the Democrats.
14
posted on
05/10/2013 1:58:01 PM PDT
by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: TomGuy
When MSNBC mentions it, the bell is tolling...
15
posted on
05/10/2013 1:59:19 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it ore leave, and visiting Niagra Fallsmay be too late.)
To: drewh
Go for it....This was a deadly heart attack compared to the hang nail known as Watergate.
To: drewh
Obama shouldn't be impeached for covering up Benghazi. He should be impeached for funneling arms from Benghazi to the Al Qaeda foreign mercenaries attacking Syria and slaughtering Christians. These are war crimes.
I doubt the Republicans will go after him for that. If anything the Republicans are mad at Obama for bungling the job and letting the cat out of the bag.
To: M-cubed
Of course it was a hit..and the scary part is not that Obama did it, I always knew he was capable of murder..it is what he is..what is truly scary is the media covering for him..THAT is the truly scary part..your taking a narcissistic President and making him invincible because he knows he can do ANYTHING and get away with it because he has the media in his back pocket
To: Viennacon
We all know the son-of-a-bitch will NEVER be convicted of anything with the current senate.
But we can sure put his sorry ass in a sling for the next 4 years. Keep em bogged down with hearings until eternity.
19
posted on
05/10/2013 2:01:16 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: Galtoid
There is something else much more sinister here.
I think they are in the pocket of the Saudis. When you are basically doing someone else’s bidding you cannot act or look decisive - it’s like one year a friend of me said that his favorite basketball team’s point guard was always bringing the ball up the floor while constantly looking at the coach in effect saying “What now coach? What do I do now coach?”. I think we have a Saudi puppet government which inherently is going to look foolish.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson