Skip to comments.
Obtaining AP phone records required Holder’s approval
Washingtonexaminer ^
Posted on 05/14/2013 10:48:34 AM PDT by chessplayer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: chessplayer
HOLDER VIOLATED AP'S FIRST AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS.
2
posted on
05/14/2013 10:50:05 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Mandatory BB Guns for 10 Year Old Boys would solve most of America's problems.)
To: chessplayer
Time to get Holder’s impeachment papers ready. That corrupt bastard needs to go.
3
posted on
05/14/2013 10:50:39 AM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: chessplayer
Rush nailed it early this afternoon: if they would have asked, the AP would have gladly GIVEN this information to Obama.
4
posted on
05/14/2013 10:50:51 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
To: chessplayer
None of the scandals revealed in the past week are any worse than those of the first term. Why does the MSM suddenly find them important?
5
posted on
05/14/2013 10:53:13 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
To: chessplayer
In going after the laughably partisan media, Holder is definitely hammering the goose that lays the golden eggs.
6
posted on
05/14/2013 10:54:33 AM PDT
by
Jack Hammer
(American)
To: Uncle Miltie
Perhaps this is just a gentle reminder of who owns who?
I hope Sally Sweelies likes very rough sex, she's gonna get a lot of it!
(This picture was taken back when the relationship was more, how shall I put it?, consensual)
I suspect AP will find that Obama, Holder and Co. can make Castro* look like a saint...
*Ariel, Fidel, whatever...
7
posted on
05/14/2013 10:54:57 AM PDT
by
null and void
(The motto of all liberals is "Using your guilt and your gelt we can get away with anything!")
To: chessplayer
Wanna bet that approval authorization form will be missing in action.
8
posted on
05/14/2013 10:55:53 AM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(Obama's Chechens are coming home...to roost.)
To: Cowboy Bob
None of the scandals revealed in the past week are any worse than those of the first term. Why does the MSM suddenly find them important?Because it involves them. It is the same reason why a reporter in a war zone is an international hero to them while a soldier means little. Because it is one of theirs.
To: chessplayer
10
posted on
05/14/2013 10:58:09 AM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Cowboy Bob
Because now it’s their credibility on the line. They carried the water for Obama and now he’s turning on them. The first law of a Leftist is to get rid of the ones that got you into power because they’re the ones who know where the bodies are buried that’ll sink you.
11
posted on
05/14/2013 10:58:32 AM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: chessplayer
I don't recall a more corrupt, in the spot light, Attorney General in US history.
Seems like all of Obama’s executive power grabs go straight through him.
12
posted on
05/14/2013 10:58:40 AM PDT
by
ryan71
(The Second American Revolution)
To: Uncle Miltie
“The Attorney Generals authorization is normally required”
DOJ can say this wasn’t a normal case.
To: chessplayer
He is trying to claim in live presser now that he recused himself from AP case months ago....he is lying.
14
posted on
05/14/2013 11:00:18 AM PDT
by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: SCHROLL
You make a good point.
Several FReepers have mentioned that the Dems have ceased to consider Republicans as a threat and are beginning their internal purges like Stalin did.
15
posted on
05/14/2013 11:01:04 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
To: chessplayer
What were they looking for at AP?
16
posted on
05/14/2013 11:03:05 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: chessplayer
The Obama administration doesn't respect or adhere to proper authority or chains of command. I'm betting that Obama, Holder, and Clinton ran very loose ships where subordinates were allowed to issue orders whether they had the clearance to or not.
-PJ
17
posted on
05/14/2013 11:04:00 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: chessplayer
Apparently, the claim is that Holder recused himself from approving the subpoena because he had already testified to Congress about the leak that was supposedly at the center of the request.
Now they will try to to say that because he recused himself, he was not responsible and had no knowledge. But that is not the case. In order to recuse himself, he had to know about the subpoena in the first place. Just because he did not actually sign the actual subpoena request does not absolve him of all knowledge and responsibility in the situation.
18
posted on
05/14/2013 11:05:45 AM PDT
by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: bigbob
Who was leaking WH information. Otoh they ignored the 3-4 staff members related to executives in the MSM
19
posted on
05/14/2013 11:06:38 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
To: chessplayer
We blame aliens.
20
posted on
05/14/2013 11:08:44 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson