Vid at link
He’s trying to protect Obama from Benghazi fallout with more enticing ideas.
Remember “MY PEOPLE” video from 2 years ago. What did he mean by “MY” people? It’s “we the people”, EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN.
What’s frustrating is that people are really missing the point of what happened here. They are defending this as necessary to go after Obama national security leakers. I agree that they shouldn’t be leaking this stuff, but that’s not why DOJ took this action.
They did this because the AP wrote articles unfavorable to them. Articles that disagreed with their statements. This was punishment. And it dried up their sources, who are now afraid to talk to them. It sends a message to the press. Disagree with us and we will make you pay.
The White House sold out that doctor in Pakistan the helped get Osama Bin Laden, but you know, national secrets are very important when it comes to our friends on foreign soil.
And then you have our Ambassador and his staff on foreign soil.
But boy, Obama and company sure are national security sticklers aren’t they.
AP: If you’re buying their excuses, you deserve to wither and die on the vine.
Those Bin Laden raid leaks that landed that Pakistani doctor in prison were pretty serious too. But that was a long time ago. What difference does it make at this point?
I don’t condone the leaking, but the messenger is hardly the problem. Same was true when leaks were made during the Bush Administration to the NYT. The problem here is the JustUs Department attempted to right the first wrong by infringing on the 1A right of the press. Their solution to a crime was to commit a crime. They put themselves above the law. That’s tyranny. That’s why we have a 2A and a perfect example of why we need to defend the 2A.
“We had to do it, but I don’t know anything about it.” Nobody in the obonbo administration is ever around or in charge of anything. All important decisions are made by underlings, so why do we have to pay for know-nothings like holder and obongo?
isn’t tapping your phone with out your
consent against the Constitution?
I wonder how it looks for the Senate in 2014...
I think DOJ was searching for Benghazi leakers myself.
There would be no “leaks” that could be utilized this way,
(strictly for the political advantage of the WH, as if they were rushing to control something that might put the nation in jeopardy), if they were even remotely forthcoming about what they were doing, enough to “trust” the Press with any information they might give THEM, and US.Instead, the Press has gone ahead and done what it is their duty to do, with little or no “guidance” from the WH. That constitutes a
“leak”.