Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims

Weekly Standard ^

[ThomasMore]

When are they gonna start jailing some of these lying treasonous ba$tards?

[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

Yesterday Obama said he would take questions today. We’ll see.

[SampleMan]

Indeed, Benghazi is a three part scandal:
1. Why did Obama put people in danger knowingly and without any response plan. The U.S. has major forces in the Med Sea all the time, where were they? A Marine amphibious helicopter ship was at sea in the area, why wasn't it right off the coast, given what was going on in Egypt, Libya, and Syria?
2. Once the attack began, why was there a total lack of action. Obama stood down all response possibilities before it was even over. Those men were left to die. Obama had no idea how long it would last, yet he preemptively opted to not even try. Had they held out for 10 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, they still would still have died, because nobody was coming.
3. After the fact, there has been a huge cover up of #1 and #2. Bald faced lies have been repeatedly told and an innocent man imprisoned, all to cover Obama’s incompetence and neglect.

[dead]

[don-o]

That would be hugh and series

I have never posted that in my whole FR career so it's marked off my bucket list

[mardi59]

I would like to know who came up with the idea to say it was an obscure video, who found Nakoula so fast after the attack, and who ordered his arrest.

How did they know about this man to be able to use him and his video so quickly. Did the State Dept. know an attack on the Embassy was going to occur on 9-11 and did they have a contingency plan in place (video) knowing that Clinton had withdrawn the extra security and her decisions must not be questioned.

Now we know the video had nothing to do with the attack. This whole thing was planned well in advance of the attack. They need to question someone on who found this man, and when did they really find him.

[blueunicorn6]

Hillary Clinton and Obama both knew from the start that this attack had nothing to do with the baloney video. Yet, they used hard-earned American taxpayer dollars to produce and air a commercial in the Middle East where they apologize for the baloney video. Why? Because the commercial was part of the political coverup. They used American tax dollars for a political coverup, and, I do believe that meets the standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors” whereby our Constitution requires an impeachment proceeding.

[Heart of Georgia]

She’s up to her eyeballs in this, along with obama and his pal, val (and all the rest).

Just like everything obama has his hand on, the current State Department is staffed with corruption and/or useful idiots.

I’m still wondering why Glen Doherty was sent out to give an interview with ABC news that exposed his mission in Libya.

I can’t make myself believe that a man of Doherty’s intelligence would have done that interview without orders from high up. A month later he’s dead.

[Sacajaweau]

Here comes the parade...aka....Distractions 101.

Cameron was last. Now PM of Turkey....

Next....Maybe a beer with OJ on the Whitehouse Lawn...near Michelle's vegetables....

which were originally planted in toxic soil.

[arthurus]

I wonder why no one has developed a method to effectively backdate emails.Surely some sort of malicious program could be built that would change the records in an archive to show an email had been archived at some convenient date and time. Obviously I am not any sort of programmer.

[ken5050]

slightly off topic question: anyone know the time for Carney’s presser today...it’s no on C-span’s schedule..I assume it will be after Obama’s at noon...

[Uncle Miltie]

The lies cover up the real crime: Running guns to Al Qaeda in Syria.

Keep shoveling, and you’ll find TREASON at the bottom of the hole.

[arthurus]

It suggests the question of what did Stevens know that the administration preferred that no one else find out?

[kidd]

It is important to know who decided to introduce the lie that a video was at fault

1. The Libyan president correctly claimed that it was an AQ attack. The US government contradicted and embarrased the Libyan government with the video lie. Because the attacks were blamed on a video, the FBI was refused admission into Libya to investigate.

2. The blame of a video instigated riots in Indonesia.

3. We were lied to by a government that is suppsed to serve us. Rice lied on TV. Clinton lied to the press and in front of Congress. Obama mislead the UN. Money was spent to lie in foreign ads to apologize for the video.

4. The video maker is still in jail. A clear 1st ammendment rights violation. The video maker was rousted out of bed at 2 am by a team of sheriffs. Who ordered them to do so, and did they really believe that a sleeping man was a flight risk or was it all show?

We STILL don’t know where the video lie was introduced.

[Sacajaweau]

I believe with all my heart that taking Petreaus down was "her job". When Obama wanted him gone....everything came out.

Surprise, surprise...

[FoxInSocks]

“Frankly, I’d just as soon not use this,”

Grammar Nazi: "I'd just assume not use this."

Editor: stet

Gen. Petraeus is correct.

[bandleader]

“I’m Shocked To Find That There Is Gambling Going On In This Establishment”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[dfwgator]

“Here’s your winnings, sir.”

[Scooter100]

I can't figure out why anyone thinks these emails are important. If the govt released them, how can we expect them to cause them any harm?

Unless, of course, the "tapes" have some "blank" sections. Hehe.

[Half Vast Conspiracy]

Just assume? I don’t think so.

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/justassume.html