Posted on 05/16/2013 4:51:15 PM PDT by raptor22
I agree. It’s of interest to me as well. But obama would just lie and say he was in constant touch and monitoring the situation. You won’t catch him on that question. Its too easy to dodge. We need to find orders or actions by obama that expose him.
I’m going to round up the usual low-level bullshiiters Rick.
He was monitoring the situation - and did nothing? That's as damning as saying he was sleeping. That's my point. Nothing was done to help those people. Was he monitoring and doing nothing, or was he otherwise occupied? It focuses everyone's mind on his most important failure, and on Hillary's most important failure. The famous commercial about the 3 AM phone call comes to mind when you think about the hours during which the diplomatic outpost was actually under attack.
Obama and Hillary had their chance to show what they were made of. An attack went on for hours, and they did nothing.
Yes it is awful to do nothing. But not impeachable.
I guess I’m more concerned about putting blame where it should be - on Obama and Hillary (our next President?) - than impeaching Obama. He can’t blame Benghazi on underlings, and Hillary can’t point to others. They were both in this one up to their ears.
Black with bling!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.