Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman
2-Its a common mistake in both the UK and US that the British are subjects, because we have the Royals. British people have been citizens since 1948 and the Nationality Act.

I stand corrrected. Good to know.

But, back to the gun thing, AKMs and AR15s are not assault rifles (a term coined by the civilian disarmament forces around the world) They are merely semi-auto look alikes. And as far as what handguns you can own, what are the restriction?Could you own a .357 revolver? What about a Glock .40 USP? it is a common perception in the USA that brit CITIZENS are required to keep firearms stored at a range. Is this true?

25 posted on 05/18/2013 4:07:58 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga

They were classed as assault rifles by the UK govt, I can still own as many as I want, but deactivated.

Handguns?. No, I cannot own the most normal handgun, sadly. The Cullen Report post-Dunblane killings never actually recommended a handgun ban, just tighter controls.

UK firearm law requires all legal owners to keep their arms in a secured cabinet, but at home is perfectly acceptable. The notion they have to be kept at a range is not true. Some gun control morons here have tried to suggest it, thats true, but nobody’s listening.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_Kingdom


26 posted on 05/18/2013 4:26:38 AM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson