Woodward: Don’t dismiss Benghazi as a scandal

Hot Air ^ | 10:01 am on May 17, 2013 | Ed Morrissey

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[Rennes Templar]

You’ve got to give them credit, trying to deflect one scandal with another.

[LyinLibs]

[Wiser now]

So, is Woodward going to behave like a journalist, pick up the phone and start asking questions now, or does he only investigate Republican presidents?
Is he in a bind, trying to preserve Hillary’s 2016 run?

[River_Wrangler]

We are missing that the reported scandal is the sideshow to deflect the real question. What was the Ambassador doing there that night and who did he meet just before the attack?

Also what was in the CIA’s warehouse? Was it the hand held missiles from Gaddafi’s armory? If so where are they now?

[alrea]

You’ve got to give them credit, trying to deflect one scandal with another.

Their next move should be interesting.

Will a few career Democrats jump ship and give up the goods on team Obamao?

[knarf]

OK .. let's discuss its criminality, then

[GOPJ]

Why were the revisions made?

•Why did Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testify before Congress that the edits were a product of the intelligence community when State officials had made many of the requests for alterations?

•Why did the White House say it made no substantive edits when the e-mails show officials there helped lead the process for changes?

•Where did the story come from that the attack grew from a protest against an anti-Islam video? The video was mentioned once in 100 pages of e-mails, but it was a central theme of Obama’s and Clinton’s description of the event.

Why didn't the dog bark?

[Jim from C-Town]

Gun Running? Where they sending arms to the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria? Inquiring minds want to know.

[Sender]

There is such an overwhelming scandal eruption right now that I shudder to think what this administration might do to make people look the other way.

[onyx]

Where did the story come from that the attack grew from a protest against an anti-Islam video? The video was mentioned once in 100 pages of e-mails, but it was a central theme of Obama’s and Clinton’s description of the event.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Good question....

Back later...got a meeting to get to.

[BerryDingle]

There’s a heluva difference between a janitor with a flashlight and treason resulting in 4 deaths.

[TBP]

What’s up with Woodward lately?

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks Ernest.

[American Constitutionalist]

Summer of 1973 all over again with scandals and perhaps a triple crown winner in ORB.

History tends to repeat it's self.

deja vu all over again.

Got to give them credit though, instead of setting the bar low as in how low can they go ? they are setting the bar high as in how many scandals can they get away with.

[American Constitutionalist]

That video was on youtube for weeks and no one mentioned it before the White Hut used it as a excuse for Muslim mayhem.

[tbird-james]

All the attention on Amb. Price’s statements is meant to take away from answering the real questions:

1. Whey were there so many CIA in ben-Ghazi?

2. What was Stevens doing there?

3. Who issued the order to stand down/not go?

4. Why was Gen Ham relieved of duty?

5. What is the expected response time on these fast react teams?

6. Why were there no extra alert teams on 9/11?

Answer these and you might find out what you don't want to know.

Could it perhaps be that we were working an arms dealt supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and/or their connects?

[Pagey]

BTTT!