[smoothsailing]

[PGalt]

Sociopath of State ALERT!

TREASON - continuous, PRE-MEDITATED, agenda-driven, in-your-face, media-complicit, AGENCY-ABETTED, representative-enabled, ongoing...

[DanielRedfoot]

Great post.

Although Hillary doesn’t solely “own” Benghazi, she is definitely neck deep in it all.

So true to form for the Clintons, the game becomes stall then obfuscate, then change the conversation, and cry, “that’s old news”

Perhaps she is thinking 2016, knew to resign to minimize exposure for Benghazi, and then leak the IRS mess which Obama no doubt totally “owns” ( being such an thinned skinned, angry, hostile, spiteful person)
This has his motivation and Marxist intent written all over it.

Thereby, the Clintons distract from the Benghazi matter, and hope to change the subject until its once again, old news. And the press simply plays along

I clearly remember 8 years of this crap with these two.

[IMR 4350]

Sorry Tom but your appeasement theory doesn’t hold water.

The terrorist are on the same page in their thinking in planning the attack as the Obama adm. is in it’s actions after the attack began.

The terrorist thinking in planning planned the attack was with group that wasn’t prepared to take the compound if resistance was encountered. When unexpected resistance was encountered the terrorist had to regrouped and there a second wave of attacks to take the compound.

The Obama adm. actions after the attack began, they tried to stop any resistance to the attack. Had the Obama adm. been successful in stopping the resistance, the first group of terrorist would have easily been able to take the compound with the forces they had and they wouldn’t have had to regroup.

Simple question.

The terrorist clearly had the manpower to take the compound if there was resistance, so why didn’t they just bring the manpower for the first attack?

[BerryDingle]

The media is still trying to dress treason up with stupidity, eye liner and lipstick. Another small problem here is the witch (rhymes with) cannot order the military to stand down.

[Carry_Okie]

But if provided, this military help would have highlighted the earlier, bad decision to keep security there weak, so the request for military help during the attack was denied.

Nice try NRO, but Hillary is not charged with making that decision. In fact, there is only ONE person who can order the US Military to make an attack on foreign soil without a declaration of war: the Commander-in-Chief. Hence, the request to make such a rescue HAD TO COME DIRECTLY TO OBAMA. He MUST have issued the denial, even if it was to say nothing. The chain of command procedure is in written protocols.

The operation was denied, Obama did it, and it's high time the media, including the National Review, started saying so.