Deceit in the Boy Scouts

OnMyHonor.net ^ | 5/13/13 | Cathy Ruse

[Ron H.]

The day they let homosexuals in, is the day the BSA will end. Pity that they cannot see this.

It has been previously reported that many if not most of those serving on the national board of the BSA have never been a Boy Scout nor served in any kind of position within the BSA organization. Nor do they have children involved within the BSA.

What a shame. Prior involvement as scouts in some capacity should be mandatory before one can serve at that level within the organization. I do know though, if the BSA BoD changes it current policies I will withdraw all support for the BSA. Allowing faggots to join will be the death knell for the BSA, IMHO.

[Ron H.]

Has the IRS taken a position on this yet?

Unsure about IRS but the Supreme Court has previously ruled on this issue.

[AdaGray]

It is amazing that people are even considering letting them in. I mean come on. The Boys Scouts of America is first and foremost for boys. And any parent who would let their son join once faggots are sanctioned as ‘leaders,’ would be off his rocker. Let them start their own Gay Scouts. They could give out merit badges for Show Tunes, Hair Styling and Interior Design.

[Elsie]

They don’t want their OWN stuff - just wanna ruin YOURS!

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Bingo.

This discussion needs to stop.

Do not change a thing. Why are we even discussing this?

[Elsie]

Why are we even discussing this?

Good Question!

---

THIS is our admonition:

Philippians 4:8

Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things.

We seem to want to 'dwell' on the wrong things...

[lentulusgracchus]

The BSA legal advisers told the National Executive Committee that it thought if such a case was brought before the SCOTUS today, BSA would lose.

Yeah, sad reminder -- they had nooooo trouble at all swallowing the recent and extremely relevant precedent of Bowers vs. Hardwick, on which the ink was barely dry, when they spun out new law de novo and ex nihilo in the Lawrence case, which has the stink of cabal all over it. Oh, really? -- a GOP-appointed AJ wrote the "opinion" (<sarc> intentional)? How ..... collegial and bipartisan of him! Traitorous scum!

And yeah, we might have real trouble with that Diesel scum Kagan on the court, and the Administration homering for every species of paraphilic perv that God ever made.

[lentulusgracchus]

The problem is that BSA is letting its enemies frame the debate

Actually, they aren't. The enemy are framing the debate without BSA complicity or cooperation.

And they would be doing so in any case. They've been conspiring nonstop against the BSA since, oh, 1990 -- or earlier. They want that trophy!

[lentulusgracchus]

And any parent who would let their son join once faggots are sanctioned as ‘leaders,’ would be off his rocker.

No, that's not what is happening here. It's homosexual activists, acting through/by homosexual (closeted) executives and complaisant "gay-friendly" fellow-travelers in business and the main BSA-supporting NGO's, attacking the BSA using the existential financial threat of withdrawn support. They did it before with the United Way, they've done it with gay-dominated city councils and NGO's.

The BSA is going to have to do without the support of false friends, and their task is no doubt complicated by the presence of homo "moles" in the upper ranks and councils of the BSA itself.

[darrellmaurina]

Bookmarked for future reference.