Dingy Harry sounds like a broken record on the nuclear option.
1 posted on
05/18/2013 4:14:30 PM PDT by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: jazusamo
Whose turn is to post previous threads showing his rank, abject hypocrisy in his praise of the filibuster — “the only thing saving this country from ruinous Republican tyranny” or somesuch — when Democrats were a minority in the Senate.
48 posted on
05/18/2013 4:54:24 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jazusamo
Meh. He’ll never do it. Fortunately, he’s nothing but hot air and as much of a threat as the squirrel that looks at you funny.
To: jazusamo
They are so sure they’ll be in power... but won’t that will help the Republicans after the next election.
It’s all or nothing next election. There will be so much fraud and illegal voting it won’t be easy.
52 posted on
05/18/2013 5:04:15 PM PDT by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: jazusamo
And how is Dingy Harry proposing to change a Senate rule when it requires 67 votes? Same way they jammed Obamacare down our throats - CHEAT.
How Many Votes to Change the Senates Rules
Senate rules require 67 votes to change the rules of the Senate. However, its actually quite possible for 50 Senatorsif backed by the Vice Presidentto have elements of existing procedural deemed unconstitutional. The US court system neither will nor should rule on things like the constitutionality of a de facto supermajority rule. But this is precisely why you have a President of the Senate (i.e., a Vice President) and I think it would be perfectly plausible for Joe Biden to say that by specifying supermajority voting for certain purposes (treaties, veto overrides, constitutional amendments) the constitution is clearly assuming majority rule for other purposes. Then it would take a majority of Senators to back up Bidens ruling. And low and behold, a return to majority rule.
63 posted on
05/18/2013 5:27:55 PM PDT by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: jazusamo
a Democratic aide told the Post. "This would take away the right to filibuster on nominations... All executive branch and judicial nominations would be subject to majority votes. He would not do it on legislative items. Yeah, tell that to Miguel Estrada. They sang a much different tune about judicial nominees when W was President. But then again, if it weren't for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
To: jazusamo
Do it Harry!
It will be a lot easier to undo Obamacare and other Obamations in 2015 after the Republicans take back the Senate.
71 posted on
05/18/2013 6:10:09 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
To: jazusamo
Too bad a recall vote can’t be mounted in Nevada to recall him.
To: jazusamo
I have a nuke option for them...
73 posted on
05/18/2013 6:20:55 PM PDT by
stevie_d_64
(It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
To: jazusamo; All
Is he desperate here? Follow me on this...
* We have an election in Massachuetts, could this quasi-Rino Seal Republican Win?
* Tangent to this, The Menedez story IMHO hasn't gone away, when does he get asked to leave for doing the nasty with 15 yr old Domincan Hookers.
* Tangent to that Lautenberg also from NJ is not that well, and could assume room temperature at any moment.
So is Dingy Harry looking at a swing of 3 not in his favor ( assuming Crispy Creme would appoint Republicans ) if we were to get lucky and run the table?
74 posted on
05/18/2013 6:27:58 PM PDT by
taildragger
(( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
To: jazusamo
He wants gun confiscation, LOST, and total abdication of the US Constitution. Doing so by Congressional action probably gives the old made guy a hardon.
76 posted on
05/18/2013 6:33:23 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: jazusamo
Always changing the rules to benefit themselves.
81 posted on
05/18/2013 6:53:46 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
To: jazusamo
Drive it like you stole it, Harry, and it sounds like you’ve had lots of insider help to steal the previous election...
82 posted on
05/18/2013 6:59:26 PM PDT by
Son House
(The Heath Care Recovery Never Gets Here, Like The Economic Recovery, Easily Predictable.)
To: jazusamo
86 posted on
05/18/2013 7:58:17 PM PDT by
kabar
To: jazusamo
Wait a gobdarn minute! What about the simmering saucer crapola stuff that chucky schumer was spouting?
87 posted on
05/18/2013 8:27:04 PM PDT by
CardeadInKy
("The problem with Liberalism is that eventually you run out of other people's money" -Marg Thatcher)
To: jazusamo
...The FIRST Rule of Obama Club.....
89 posted on
05/18/2013 8:44:06 PM PDT by
R_Kangel
( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
To: jazusamo
What a far cry from Harry’s attitude in 2005.
It’s still on their own website too!
http://democrats.senate.gov/2005/05/18/reid-floor-speech-on-use-of-filibuster/
“The filibuster is far from a procedural gimmick. It is part of the fabric of this institution. It was well known in colonial legislatures, and it is an integral part of our countrys 217 years of history.” — Then Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid, May 2005.
To: jazusamo
He is an evil, twisted little man obsessed with his own importance. What a shallow shell of a human being. *shudder*
93 posted on
05/19/2013 6:46:14 AM PDT by
Monkey Face
(If I had a dollar for every time I was distracted, I wish I had a puppy.)
To: jazusamo
Fine, change the Senate rules now... this will be veryconvenient when the pendulum swings the other way.
95 posted on
05/19/2013 9:41:52 AM PDT by
Rodamala
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson