Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Dingy Harry sounds like a broken record on the nuclear option.
1 posted on 05/18/2013 4:14:30 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: jazusamo

Whose turn is to post previous threads showing his rank, abject hypocrisy in his praise of the filibuster — “the only thing saving this country from ruinous Republican tyranny” or somesuch — when Democrats were a minority in the Senate.


48 posted on 05/18/2013 4:54:24 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Meh. He’ll never do it. Fortunately, he’s nothing but hot air and as much of a threat as the squirrel that looks at you funny.


51 posted on 05/18/2013 5:03:55 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

They are so sure they’ll be in power... but won’t that will help the Republicans after the next election.

It’s all or nothing next election. There will be so much fraud and illegal voting it won’t be easy.


52 posted on 05/18/2013 5:04:15 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
And how is Dingy Harry proposing to change a Senate rule when it requires 67 votes? Same way they jammed Obamacare down our throats - CHEAT.

How Many Votes to Change the Senate’s Rules

Senate rules require 67 votes to change the rules of the Senate. However, it’s actually quite possible for 50 Senators—if backed by the Vice President—to have elements of existing procedural deemed unconstitutional. The US court system neither will nor should rule on things like the constitutionality of a de facto supermajority rule. But this is precisely why you have a President of the Senate (i.e., a Vice President) and I think it would be perfectly plausible for Joe Biden to say that by specifying supermajority voting for certain purposes (treaties, veto overrides, constitutional amendments) the constitution is clearly assuming majority rule for other purposes. Then it would take a majority of Senators to back up Biden’s ruling. And low and behold, a return to majority rule.
63 posted on 05/18/2013 5:27:55 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
a Democratic aide told the Post. "This would take away the right to filibuster on nominations... All executive branch and judicial nominations would be subject to majority votes. He would not do it on legislative items.”

Yeah, tell that to Miguel Estrada. They sang a much different tune about judicial nominees when W was President. But then again, if it weren't for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.

70 posted on 05/18/2013 5:58:01 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Do it Harry!

It will be a lot easier to undo Obamacare and other Obamations in 2015 after the Republicans take back the Senate.


71 posted on 05/18/2013 6:10:09 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Too bad a recall vote can’t be mounted in Nevada to recall him.


72 posted on 05/18/2013 6:20:34 PM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I have a nuke option for them...


73 posted on 05/18/2013 6:20:55 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo; All
Is he desperate here? Follow me on this...

* We have an election in Massachuetts, could this quasi-Rino Seal Republican Win?
* Tangent to this, The Menedez story IMHO hasn't gone away, when does he get asked to leave for doing the nasty with 15 yr old Domincan Hookers.
* Tangent to that Lautenberg also from NJ is not that well, and could assume room temperature at any moment.

So is Dingy Harry looking at a swing of 3 not in his favor ( assuming Crispy Creme would appoint Republicans ) if we were to get lucky and run the table?

74 posted on 05/18/2013 6:27:58 PM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

He wants gun confiscation, LOST, and total abdication of the US Constitution. Doing so by Congressional action probably gives the old made guy a hardon.


76 posted on 05/18/2013 6:33:23 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Always changing the rules to benefit themselves.


81 posted on 05/18/2013 6:53:46 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Drive it like you stole it, Harry, and it sounds like you’ve had lots of insider help to steal the previous election...


82 posted on 05/18/2013 6:59:26 PM PDT by Son House (The Heath Care Recovery Never Gets Here, Like The Economic Recovery, Easily Predictable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Immigration bill?


86 posted on 05/18/2013 7:58:17 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Wait a gobdarn minute! What about the simmering saucer crapola stuff that chucky schumer was spouting?


87 posted on 05/18/2013 8:27:04 PM PDT by CardeadInKy ("The problem with Liberalism is that eventually you run out of other people's money" -Marg Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
...The FIRST Rule of Obama Club.....

 photo ObamaClub_zpsa71bbe27.jpg

89 posted on 05/18/2013 8:44:06 PM PDT by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

What a far cry from Harry’s attitude in 2005.

It’s still on their own website too!

http://democrats.senate.gov/2005/05/18/reid-floor-speech-on-use-of-filibuster/

“The filibuster is far from a “procedural gimmick.” It is part of the fabric of this institution. It was well known in colonial legislatures, and it is an integral part of our country’s 217 years of history.” — Then Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid, May 2005.


90 posted on 05/18/2013 11:21:44 PM PDT by CountryClassSF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

He is an evil, twisted little man obsessed with his own importance. What a shallow shell of a human being. *shudder*


93 posted on 05/19/2013 6:46:14 AM PDT by Monkey Face (If I had a dollar for every time I was distracted, I wish I had a puppy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Fine, change the Senate rules now... this will be veryconvenient when the pendulum swings the other way.
95 posted on 05/19/2013 9:41:52 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson