I do not see the word "allegedly" in the article.
1 posted on
05/18/2013 8:30:34 PM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
"One pro-gun protester was detained temporarily and cited for disorderly conduct." We assume innocence until proven guilty.
2 posted on
05/18/2013 8:40:03 PM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: marktwain
The word “allegedly” is reserved for violent criminals. The person arrested clings to God and to guns, so he does not deserve the presumption of innocence. All he deserves is an IRS audit.
3 posted on
05/19/2013 2:02:19 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
"In many cases, they'll end up circulating back in the communities we're trying to take them out of," said Wayne County Chief of Police Operations Rafael Washington said.
Well its a statement but I'm not sure there's anything to back it up.
Michigan legislative action thread
4 posted on
05/19/2013 3:14:28 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: marktwain
5 posted on
05/19/2013 3:27:25 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: marktwain
What kind of junk are they buying for $50?
6 posted on
05/19/2013 3:38:03 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: marktwain
Yet how many gang bangers have been arrested in these buybacks while they are standing in line? I am sure there have been murderers who got rid of their guns.
As usual, the gov targets the easy marks and lets the criminals walk free.
8 posted on
05/19/2013 4:53:35 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
