Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bratch
In the 1st "new" installment the villain traveled back in time and altered the timeline, conveniently.

Now the writers can go back, revisit the old Roddenberry stories and "reimagine" them - in other words they can use any characters or situations they choose and weave their own schlock around it. This time it was Kahn (same character only different). Call it "homage" but whole scenes were lifted out of Wrath of Kahn with only minor differences (This time it's Kirk dying inside the radiation-filled chamber).

I also witnessed the introduction of those furball tribbles, or one of them anyway.

Is Roddenberry's widow still alive? Wonder how she feels about this?

This movie made enough $$$$ there's bound to be another one, which begs the question, "What character will they resurrect this time? My money's on:

...and his wife, of course.

8 posted on 05/21/2013 12:13:54 PM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ZOOKER

"What character will they resurrect this time? My money's on:

...and his wife, of course.


If they do, you might be surprised.

Star Trek Into Darkness: Harry Mudd Is A Woman?

14 posted on 05/21/2013 12:49:09 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson