Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Lerner said she broke no IRS regulation. If they find that she broke even one - even such as taking office supplies for personal use, she can be questioned about it. She had no 5th Amendment protection for that since she had declared that she broke no regulation. She would also be open to perjury since she was under oath.

Obviously, the above is an absurd case, but if there is a significant regulation broken, she is in deep doo-doo ...


424 posted on 05/23/2013 11:15:16 AM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]


To: Lmo56
I posted this earlier on another thread:

IMHO, this should not matter...She also stated previously that the reason she was taking the fifth was to not incriminate others. She is innocent, remember...as a new born babe.

However, the the fifth amendment protects one against "SELF" incrimination, right? So...

1. You cannot take the fifth for someone else and,

2. She knows incriminating information on someone else.

The fifth amendment does not apply here and she admitted she has knowledge of criminal activity. She needs to be compelled and held in contempt if she tries to plead again.

426 posted on 05/23/2013 11:18:46 AM PDT by IrishPennant (All warfare is based on deception.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

To: Lmo56

She is not in any do-do, because Issa is not going to let this case harm Obama.


427 posted on 05/23/2013 11:37:42 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson