Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The claim that the ongoing IRS scandal is limited to low level employees is falling apart.
Fox 19 Cincinnati Ohio ^ | May 21 2013 | Ben Swan

Posted on 05/22/2013 6:36:30 PM PDT by crosslink

The six Cincinnati workers we have identified, who sent scrutinizing letters to conservative groups with words including "patriot, liberty, tea party or 9-12" in their names are Mitchel Steele, Carly Young, Joseph Herr, Stephen Seok, Liz Hofacre and a woman identified only as Ms. Richards.

But was all of this done at the hands of a small group of Cincinnati employees working together? During Friday's congressional hearing, that appeared to be the theme. Now, that explanation just became less likely.

Mitchel Steele, Carly Young, Joseph Herr and Liz Hofacre are IRS agents. Stephen Seok is a supervisor IRS agent But according to the IRS employee directory that FOX19 has obtained exclusively, each of these agents has a different manager and then above them a different territory manager. That is important because while it may sound reasonable to the average person that these workers began targeting groups on their own, the IRS structure is designed to Keep in mind, at least 300 groups were targeted out of Cincinnati alone. Those applications spent anywhere from 18 months to nearly 3 years in the system and some still don't have their non-profit status. 300 groups multiplied by at least 18 months for each group, means thousands of red flags would have been generated in the system.

So who in the chain of command would have received all these flags? The answer, according to the IRS directory, one woman in Cincinnati, Cindy Thomas, the Program Manager of the Tax Exempt Division. Because all six of our IRS workers have different individual and territory managers, Cindy Thomas is one manager they all have common.

It turns out Cindy Thomas' name is one we have heard before. The independent journalism group ProPublica says in November of 2012 they had requested information on conservatives groups that had received non-profit status. Along with that information, the IRS released private information on nine conservative groups that had not yet been approved and personal information had not been redacted. The person who signed off on that release, Cindy Thomas.

What this means for you... consider this chain of command since the story broke.

Former Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller… retires

Joseph Grant, Commissioner of Tax Exempt and Government Entities... retires.

Lois Lerner, Head of Exempt Organization…says she will invoke her 5th amendment right to not incriminate herself when called before Congress on Wednesday.

Holly Paz, Director of Exempt Organizations, subpoenaed to Washington to be interviewed by members of Congress.

All of this IRS leadership, in Washington D.C.

Then one level down is Cindy Thomas, the highest ranking employee in Cincinnati in this Tax Exempt and Government Entities Department that no one in Congress is talking to... yet.

Watch video


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: benswan; benswann; cindythomas; gettherope; impeachnow; irs; irscincinnati; irspropublica; irsscandal; loislerner; obama; propublica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: crosslink

Wasn’t this obvious from what happened to True the Vote? They even had OSHA after them. Do low level guys/gals have the power to order other departments and agencies to do this stuff?

I doubt it.


21 posted on 05/22/2013 8:46:33 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

I just told my wife earlier this evening that if Congress really wanted to know what happened, how it happened and by whose authority they would conduct a process audit starting with the lowest level employee involved. My conclusion: they really don’t want to know.


22 posted on 05/22/2013 9:02:09 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; crosslink
Takes a local reporter to find out the story, great summary of structure of IRS , no way DC didn't know

More REAL investigators are needed! Something I posted on another discussion about the IRS investigation

The conservatives and honest liberals are making a concerted effort to get to the facts; HOWEVER, I would suggest that they ask the right questions of the wrong people.

Considering how the anointed one operates I wonder who has oversight of the Czars and their networks? How can there ever be possible checks and balances over the informal nameless community organized styled mirror administration that President Obama seems to meet and consult with more frequently than the Senate confirmed or Presidentially appointed figureheads presently riding desks in Washington?

A Real investigator and or news reporter needs to get the names of these people so that they may be brought in for questioning as to their roles in this corrupt and criminal enterprise.


23 posted on 05/22/2013 10:52:01 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
honest liberals

I'm throwing the oxymoronic flag on that.

24 posted on 05/22/2013 10:55:10 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers

ROTFLMAO!!!! I try to give a benefit of doubt that there is at least two of them.


25 posted on 05/22/2013 11:03:23 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Six employees working for different first line supervisors but tied out to a common second or third line supe just screams dedicated working group/task group to me ...


26 posted on 05/22/2013 11:07:45 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink
300 groups multiplied by at least 18 months for each group, means thousands of red flags would have been generated in the system

That would depend on how the roll up reporting in the system is constructed, wouldn't it?

Looking at the apparent org chart involved it looks like the work was distributed across five staff (excluding the "supervisor" - maybe a working group lead?) each working for a different manager AND "territory manager".

So simple and assumed (extrapolated from the org chart) math (5x5x5) points to five staff out of 125 being part of that organization.

Or, rather, 4% of the staff reporting to Cindy Thomas. Assuming there aren't even more layers of management between the "territory managers" and her.

That's as beautifully a "distributed" workload as I've ever seen. Almost by design (NO! It wouldn't be that!) it would serve to obscure what was really happening in the reporting.
27 posted on 05/22/2013 11:38:13 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson