Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
I’ve lived in several states, and in none of them have I seen any reason to believe the legislature would be more likely to elect a good Senate than the general populace

The point was not a "good" senate, whatever that means, but an avenue of federalism whereby the States had a strong voice in Washington to temper an ambitious and abusive central government. Popular vote removed federalism from the national legislature, to the enduring detriment of the States. And ultimately the Nation as a whole.

The change was of course a part of the Progressive Era agenda in the early twentieth century, the most catastrophic 20 years in the nation's history.

14 posted on 05/22/2013 7:10:18 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard

My point was that I’ve yet to see any reason to believe a Senate elected by the States would be more likely to convict and remove from office an impeached President that a Senate elected by the people of that State.

Your point about the weakening of federalism is well-taken, but it has little to do with impeachment


25 posted on 05/22/2013 8:51:31 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard

Patrick Henry predicted rapid consolidation of all power into the new government. James Madison responded that could not happen as long as we had a Senate of the States.

The Framers got it right.


30 posted on 05/23/2013 4:39:15 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Repeal the 17th Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson