“On such a serious issue, roadblocks to official documents never should have been tolerated.”
If you disagree, I don't care. It is my belief that CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TRUMPS ALL OTHER LAW.
I am not going to debate this with you. I will not listen to any "reason" on this. There is no argument which will sway me from the truth of this statement, and rather than attempt it, you should merely recognize the truth in it for yourself.
What is the matter with us when we tolerate a petty state law interfering with verification of the credentials for the most powerful office in the world?
How have lesser courts dared to tamper with this principle? We need to burn down the existing court structure and rebuild it so that it is fit for a Free Republic.
“I will not listen to any “reason” on this. There is no argument which will sway me from the truth of this statement...”
Written like a true birther!
“What is the matter with us when we tolerate a petty state law interfering with verification of the credentials for the most powerful office in the world?”
Yes. What is law doing interfering with your wants? Who is a judge to tell you that you do not understand the law, or the issues? The Mighty DiogenesLamp has opined, and all must bow before him!
Well, sorry. As you may have noticed by now, the courts are not overwhelmed with concern for pleasing your personal interpretation of Constitutional law. They tend to place more emphasis on Original Intent, rather than DiogenesLamp Intent.
“How have lesser courts dared to tamper with this principle? We need to burn down the existing court structure and rebuild it so that it is fit for a Free Republic.”
All hail DiogenesLamp, KING OF THE UNIVERSE! (BTW - that is a GS-100 position...very impressive). He wields the ONE Ring, and ALL must bow before Him!
Well, sorry DL, but you are not supreme ruler, and don’t get to make the rules for the rest of us to live by. Minor things like jurisdiction, ability to provide relief, evidence, authority of statutory law in the activities of elections...those pesky details will continue to provide the framework of our society.
But thank you for being honest enough to admit no argument will persuade you. The problem is not Constitutional Law, but your refusal to accept Constitutional Law and the division of power it provides.