I couldn't agree more. It irks me no end to read that every single image of Stanley Ann Dunham, for example, is a photoshopped construct and she never existed as a person. That's just a waste-paper-basket for lazy minds imo. Each image needs to be looked at in context to the myth; for example, the Central Park sequence, in which it's plain to see that zero was added, between the two people on the bench.
Why would they do that? I assume it could be because by that time in the early eighties, the relationship between the elder Dunhams and zero had broken down. That image was created for that reason.
Zero on the couch with Siddiqi has had so much written about it and I can't see why. I used to be a smoker. Where's the ashtray? He's holding it on his knee, with the hand that is holding the cigarette. A lot of time wasted on that one. Meanwhile, I wonder did anyone bother to note that Siddiqi, after saying that zero gave him a job referrence, is still shown as working for a Seattle theatre? Probably not. The holding-hands story got all the attention. How many hours were collectively spent on counting his fingers...
I’m glad you agree about the ‘everything’s a Photoshop’ false meme. Our government has caused some of that by putting out false material too.
I’m a smoker and you’ve got me looking at that picture over and over, trying to figure it out - but it’s not a big concern of mine, lol. I hope we all learn the truth about some things.....someday.....