Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marcella

This is utterly ridiculous. What was wrong with “significant threat”? Let’s have a war, but let’s not kill any of the enemy. That’s not kosher.

This man should not have been re-elected. Also, I don’t see why we put our military in harm’s way if they can’t defend themselves.


414 posted on 05/23/2013 1:03:16 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The right to self-defense is older than the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: popdonnelly
“Also, I don’t see why we put our military in harm’s way if they can’t defend themselves.”

His rules have also said for a long time that the military can't fire upon anyone in Afghanistan unless the person fires at them FIRST.

If I were a man (let's not talk about women on the front line which is nuts), I would not be in this military because I couldn't fire on an enemy unless I gave him an opportunity to kill me first, and the man next to me will likely be a homosexual who wants my body. I would shoot the queer if he approached me and shoot the enemy before he got off a shot, so I would be court martialed fast and spend years in military prison.

God bless our non-homosexual military and I hope they live in spite of their fake commander in chief.

439 posted on 05/23/2013 2:18:28 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson