To: Nachum
I keep thinking about her testimony. The woman is supposed to be a lawyer, had advice from a lawyer but managed to invalidate her 5th amendment rights. Is it possible she did it on purpose and is her ‘leave’ because they figured out she did it on purpose?
12 posted on
05/23/2013 2:11:28 PM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: liberalh8ter
Good suppositions.
I guess we’ll know if/when she is called back to Congress again. I’d LOVE to see her start naming names and throwing officials under the bus.
19 posted on
05/23/2013 2:15:17 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: liberalh8ter
"Is it possible she did it on purpose and is her ‘leave’ because they figured out she did it on purpose?"I've wondered if Issa might be trying to cut a deal. I've also wondered if the tracks don't lead to Obama's Rasputin (Valerie Jarrett).
Either way, May/June is a great time to take an extended paid vacation. Why haven't I ever had an employer like that?
27 posted on
05/23/2013 2:20:03 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: liberalh8ter
On a different thread I posted something similar. Just wishful thinking on my part but I thought it might be a way for her to intentionally be made to testify against some superior without looking like she wanted to.
116 posted on
05/23/2013 4:12:57 PM PDT by
Kalam
(<: The answer is 42 :>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson