Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: re_tail20

Hopefully Quinn will veto it. Then we default to Contitutional carry here in Illinois.


6 posted on 05/25/2013 4:34:26 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
Hopefully Quinn will veto it. Then we default to Contitutional carry here in Illinois.

That does appear to be the best scenario. Did you read the article the other day that Quinn and Emmanuel wanted the bill to have a "local jurisdiction" clause, giving every municipality the power to draft their own conceal-carry ordinances?

Can you imagine the cluster-doodle that'd create? Just imagine being legally carrying in your home town, but never knowing whether or not you're legally carrying as you traverse municipal boundaries in the state. Yep, that was Quinn's way of making it impossible to legally conceal-carry in the state. Surely the Federal Appeal's court would've shot that down if the state legislature passed it and Quinn signed it.

I hope each and every one of these a-holes running this state genuinely fear for their lives after June 9th. It's serve them right for the absolute mess they've created.

16 posted on 05/25/2013 5:33:53 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Exactly. What will the criminals now do in Chicago when the intended victims can shoot back? Should be fun to watch.


56 posted on 05/25/2013 9:56:18 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson