DOJ: Social Media Posts Trashing Muslims May Violate Civil Rights

Judicial Watch ^ | May 30, 2013

[MeganC]

Mohammed was the Prince of Lies.

[Veto!]

I’m of Irish descent, my ex was from Puerto Rico. We had a sign on our door, Mick’n’Spic. So sue us.

[opentalk]

...add the state department increasing and fast tracking Saudi Arabia visas

[musicman]

Less Than $2.9k To Go!!
Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[Artcore]

Maybe if a few more “Journalists” get their heads sawed off by these filthy, inbread pigs they’ll change their views. No, they won’t!

[william clark]

[Nita Nupress]

In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S. the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights.

What am i missing? Nowhere in this article do i see anything to substantiate this. Where is the follow-up link or factual information that backs up this declarative sentence?

[Slings and Arrows]

---

[savedbygrace]

The area’s top federal prosecutor, Bill Killian, will address a topic that most Americans are likely unfamiliar with, even those well versed on the Constitution; that federal civil rights laws can actually be violated by those who post inflammatory documents aimed at Muslims on social media.

If Killian is correct, then the federal civil rights laws violate the U. S. Constitution.

[Slings and Arrows]

[thegrump]

Oh but it is perfectly fine to trash Christians and Jews & LDS etc, etc! What a bunch of hypocritical leftist A-holes the DOJ is.

[jazusamo]

In the second live link in this article “newspaper report” it lays it out.

excerpt:

“Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media.”

http://www.tullahomanews.com/?p=15360

[x]

Kevin Bacon was in Christmas in Rockefeller Center (2001) with Rudolph Giuliani.

Rudolph Giuliani was in the conspiracy film Mysteries of 911 (2006) with Osama bin Laden.

Coincidence?

[okie01]

In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S. the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights.

Somebody should ask Holder whether or not use of the term "nigger" in social media is a civil rights violation.

Unacceptable language, yes. Insensitive, to be sure. But a violation of ci8vi8l rights, under the First Amendment? I hardly think so.

How about "spic", Eric?

And, for that matter, "honky"? Or "bible-thumper"? Or "Jesus-freak"? Are those also "civil rights violations", Mr. Attorney General?

The Constitution's guarantee of "equality under the law" does not have a special clause exempting Islam.

[jazusamo]

If Killian is correct, then the federal civil rights laws violate the U. S. Constitution.

I agree with you completely, also believe Killian is full of it.

[Slings and Arrows]

With enough tinfoil, nothing is a coincidence.

[jazusamo]

Amen to that!

[M Kehoe]

Yo Erik Holder. Chupar mi polla.

5.56mm