By Michael Collins Posted May 21, 2010 
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern Tennessee District, William Killian 
Posted on 06/01/2013 6:34:17 AM PDT by KeyLargo
By Michael Collins Posted May 21, 2010
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern Tennessee District, William Killian
Members of a certain political party understand that Islam will give them sexual access to small boys and the ability to have child brides. THAT is the attraction to THEM!
But now comes the US Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee explicitly telling you that you may be imprisoned if a political appointee decides your political speech has crossed a line.
*********
Somewhat similiar to the concept of death panels wherein “special” appointees (political, of course) get to decide the fate of others. Dems hate personal choice, freedom and the concept of responsibility.
I’m sure they will also prosecute the hate speech of LaRaza and the New Black Panthers...NOT!
I prefer to be raptured before patriots start having to defend freedom with the 3rd box, but it is not my call.
The soap box and ballot box have failed egregiously.
Learn the difference between a
U.S. District court and a
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/karmacts.htm
District court of the U.S.
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.htm
Does a U.S.Attorney have jurisdiction??
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
The first amendment protection of free speech is already meaningless in all levels of academia, much of the news media, in the government bureaucracy, in the military, in labor unions, in many statehouses, and in most large corporations. Once the leftists gain control of both the House and Senate, as well as one more seat on the Supreme Court, we will see the “living” Constitution enshrined to be defined by Supreme Court dictate. Congress will pass hate speech laws which will be upheld by the Supreme Court and enforced by the federal government. Say goodbye to talk radio, internet bloggers, the Tea Party, and any group that opposes the progressive agenda. Those FEMA camps will fill up rapidly.
“You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas”
Yes, they do take an oath to uphold the constitution and we need to start making them adhere to that oath.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
“A U.S. attorney in Tennessee is reportedly vowing to use federal civil rights statutes to clamp down on offensive and inflammatory speech about Islam.”
The Roberts court has already ruled on this in the Westboro Baptist Church case:
Quoting Roberts:
“Speech is powerful, it can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and as it did here inflict great pain. But under the First Amendment, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. Instead, the national commitment to free speech, he said, requires protection of even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.”
This pathetic excuse for a U.S. attorney won’t even make it past the circuit judges if he tries such nonsense and attempts to prosecute.
I guess that “Separation of Church and State” thing only applies to Christians and Jews. No way is this an endorsement of a religion /sarc off
I just finished reading Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Numbers, Joshua and Psalms with my son and did not find any sections calling for the suffering or death of infidels or anyone unless they had committed some crime, such as murder or adultery.
Just to make sure I get it. You have people of that ‘religion’ bomb the Boston Marathon and cut off a soldiers head - and the response is to jail people that complain about it?
How is this supposed help things?
Can I put a representation of Mohamed with a pressure cooker on his head, surrounded by naked little boys and girls into a jar of urine and display it as art?
Well, Justice Department, can I?
Yeah...I could imagine...NOTHING happening. Not one darn thing would happen to them! In fact they post videos all the time talking about killing infidels/jews/Christians/Americans or anybody else they decide this week to hate!
Can’t wait. Bring it on.
NO!
Below photo is approved by DOJ however.... 
No, the feds did not say that anti-Muslim speech can be punished, one federal prosecutor in Tennessee, said it. Of course, it cannot be punished in the US, any more than those who criticize Christianity can be punished.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.