Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

The A-7 was a concept looking for an engine until late in the war.

It was certainly good and yes, probably a tighter turner than USN aircraft, but I wouldn’t say superior. US aircraft were still more heavily armed and protected, as well has faster. I would put it on par.

Of course, by the time Japanese engine development made the A-7 viable, the USN was looking at new aircraft. Had the war continued, late 1945 and 1946 were going to see the F8F Bearcat replace the F6F Hellcat, the Boeing F8B, the British Sea Fury, etc. The point being that the Japanese started with a lead and blew it.


56 posted on 06/02/2013 9:36:21 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

The A-7 development should have been priority one. The IJN spent so much R&D and time on the B6n Tenzan, which to the IJN credit was a good attack air craft, when that should not have been the priority as the B5n was pretty darn good anyway.


63 posted on 06/02/2013 11:07:09 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson