I think, however, that the ruling of the Supreme Court would trump Nancy Pelosi, so therefore, OK is right and it is a tax that did not originate as constitutionally mandated.
I’ve never understood why this was not pursued by other groups, since it has always seemed to me that Roberts, for whatever reason, had provided the perfect out.
I have thought the same thing but only to a degree... by declaring it a tax the court (that I can’t call supreme) ruled that congress created a tax? If so then how can it be argued that the tax is unconstitutional?
And yes, Oklahoma offers ethanol free gasoline in some locations... not sure how much longer this will go on or how it has been managed but I am grateful for it.