Replies

I am not condoning the BSA decision by any means. I disagree with it. However, the policy is to not condone ANY inappropriate sexual behavior/misbehavior, whether it be hetero or homo in nature.

So I think people saying that BSA is now condoning gay lifestyle is incorrect, or an overstatement. I still think the decision was wrong and will have bad consequences for BSA.

<....”However, the policy is to not condone ANY inappropriate sexual behavior/misbehavior, whether it be hetero or homo in nature”....>

That is just another way of ‘silencing the debate’...and when you silence the debate “truth” is never heard.

We are not ignorant of the enemies devises.

However, the policy is to not condone ANY inappropriate sexual behavior/misbehavior, whether it be hetero or homo in nature.

Try this logic on for size. When a ten year old child walks into the BSA with a heterosexual label on their forehead it means they are physically a male or a female -the label is not subjectively chosen and declared -it is a fact of nature. Heterosexual is a scientific term that describes how a species procreates. Young males (boys) become members of the BSA.

NOW, When a ten year old child walks into the BSA with a homosexual label on their forehead it means they prefer to engage in homosexual sex -the label is subjectively chosen and declared -it is a state of mind. Homosexual is a fabricated term with no basis in science that describes how an individual sexually recreates.

The ONLY differentiator between the self declared homosexual and the self evident heterosexual is the SEX.

So, tell me again how accepting the sex label and having those that disagree with it effectively muzzled and not able to disagree with it has nothing to do with condoning the sex?

There are no 'gay' beings. For that matter a child that is not sexually active can no way in hell declare that they prefer homosexual sex.

Accepting homosexuals in the BSA not only is evil because it subjects those not affected to the evil but as well because it 'cements' the condition in youth already led astray. The BSA in effect is sacrificing youth to the devil.

So I think people saying that BSA is now condoning gay lifestyle is incorrect, or an overstatement. I

How can you possibly say that with a straight face?

If a boy who thinks he is “gay” became a Boy Scout in the past, he would just keep it to himself. With this policy, any such boys are free to be “out” as much as they want - otherwise how would anyone even know? And you are aware that already there are complaints and agitation that homosexual Boy Scout Leaders are not allowed - that will fall very soon, mark my words.