Skip to comments.
Guantanamo Bay hunger strike grows; 41 now being force-fed
The Washington Post ^
| June 6, 2013
| Peter Finn
Posted on 06/06/2013 3:27:58 PM PDT by KingofZion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: KingofZion
If it's torture to waterboard them, we should not force feed them. Let them starve to death!
21
posted on
06/06/2013 3:52:19 PM PDT
by
drpix
To: KingofZion
Dig 41 graves and show them being lined with pig innards.
Let them then choose to eat and live or starve to death and be buried with pigs.
22
posted on
06/06/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT
by
DakotaRed
(Why not just pass a law requiring criminals to obey the laws?)
To: KingofZion
They’ll force feed muslim prisoners, but take away hot breakfasts from our troops in Afghanistan?
To: tet68
As one can tell, my patience is at an end.
You cannot rationalize with mad dogs
and since as yet we cannot kill a billion
and a whatever muslims, we must strike at
the pillars of their belief and that would
be the protection of their “sacred” places.
24
posted on
06/06/2013 3:58:04 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: fwdude
Headshots. 230gr .45cal ACP HPs. End of Troglodyte problem.
25
posted on
06/06/2013 3:58:08 PM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
To: KingofZion
I don’t understand why we are feeding them? Why?
To: argentus
New here, aren’t you.
The Founding Fathers would have had them hanged years ago.
27
posted on
06/06/2013 4:02:33 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: KingofZion
If they were serious about a hunger strike, they wouldn’t allow themselves to be force-fed.
See “Bobby Sands”.
28
posted on
06/06/2013 4:03:51 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: drpix
This might feed the bunch faster.
29
posted on
06/06/2013 4:07:22 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: KingofZion
I know how to put and end to this quickly.
Don’t force them to eat.
If they don’t want to eat, then let them not eat.
Sheesh!
Isn’t feeding them when they don’t want to eat, a violation of their human rights?
30
posted on
06/06/2013 4:09:56 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Funny thing happened on the way to the Constitution burning, Lefties rights were Iviolated...)
To: argentus
A very poor “first post ever” on FR, NOOB!
31
posted on
06/06/2013 4:10:37 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: stboz
Force feed bacon morning, noon and night. Bacon's precious. Give 'em scrapple.
To: Repeal The 17th; argentus
I sense a hint of ozone in the air.
33
posted on
06/06/2013 4:14:37 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: argentus
Well, they should give them a constitutional trial or give them their freedom. Keeping them detained without sentencing is so illegal it would make the founding fathers heads spin.IBTZ.
The Founding Fathers knew how to deal with the enemy -- you are very mistaken in what principles guided them.
To: jazusamo
argentus...
he/she/it has been vaporized
-
This account has been banned or suspended.
35
posted on
06/06/2013 4:33:34 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Thanks, I suspected it wouldn’t be long.
36
posted on
06/06/2013 4:39:16 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: KingofZion
Let them starve. We need to make room at Gitmo for IRS senior executives.
37
posted on
06/06/2013 4:51:50 PM PDT
by
DFG
("Dumb, Dependent, and Democrat is no way to go through life" - Louie Gohmert (R-TX))
To: Repeal The 17th
This account has been banned or suspended.I sent a note to the Admin Moderator on this when I saw the despicable post requesting that the author be shown the door. Normally, I would have perhaps at least made an attempt to engage the miscreant in some form of corrective dialog.
Not on D-Day! When I think of the ultimate sacrifices made by so many, the remark defending our enemies at Gitmo was just too much -- even for me, a rather easy-going individual. I saw no reason why such an individual should tarnish this day with such a vile message.
To: knarf
good question
39
posted on
06/06/2013 5:19:50 PM PDT
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: KingofZion
Accede to their wishes. Didn’t Terry Schindler Schiavo tell us it was a peaceful, pleasant way to go? Well, at least that’s what her HINO’s lawyers said.
40
posted on
06/06/2013 5:22:58 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson