Understanding the Viciousness of the Gay Left

On Tuesday, June 4, the gay lobby -- for the purposes here, "the Gay Left" -- was exposed for its intrinsically sociopathic tendencies. As the shock settles in about the Human Rights Campaign's possibly felonious violation of fellow citizens' civil rights, it is fitting that I should introduce the uninitiated reader to a basic overview of the Gay Left and the simultaneous totalitarianism and anomie that have shaped it since the famous Stonewall rebellion of 1969.

In light of the fluffy report issued this week by the College Republican National Committee urging the right, in part, to abandon opposition to gay marriage, the message I am about to deliver is triply urgent: don't fall for the con!

The Gay Left is not the same thing as gay people, many of whom are good folks. The Gay Left is also not, despite what one might think, merely another part of the liberal intelligentsia. It is a peculiar creature, a specific cluster of organizations that evolved from the specific environmental stresses of police repression, psychiatric stigma, and AIDS.

The problem is that while in America the institutionalized persecution of homosexuals has been dispersed into episodes of de facto social friction (as opposed to de jure discrimination) the survival instincts that grew out of an earlier age of repression -- many of which become destructive if they outlive their moment of necessity -- remain integral to the Gay Left's political apparatus.

During hearings on Capitol Hill, Chapman University professor John Eastman of the National Organization for Marriage unveiled new evidence that the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay advocacy organization, may have feloniously obtained confidential tax documents from the IRS and then published them with the intent of humiliating political opponents.

An excellent post. Too many fail to distinguish between the militant sexual progressive gay community and those they know who are gay buy of course the media has been complicit. They exaggerate any animus or potential animus against gays. A crime against a gay man is held up as a great example even when it is no different than that against a heterosexual man and the criminal in question having a history of violence regardless of sexual orientation gender etc. So we end up with a myth that gays are unduly bullied and suffer violence out of the ordinary to the general population which is just a lie. America even with Anti-Sodomy laws has never been a place where gays were targeted provided they did not court underage kids and such.

That is where we face a new danger because increased acceptance of homosexuality is riding a wave of increased acceptance of sexual overtness and sex focused behavior. The whole gay movement which lifts up gender identity as the premier character trait alone should give anyone pause who doesn’t want human sexuality further reduced to if it feels good do it and the born this way idea opens a multi lane sexual highway to greater normalization of all forms of sexual bad behavior. Are rapists not also born that way? If one can not be expected to resist their animal desires how long can punishments and standards of decency last?

This reductio ad bestia is at the heart of the progressive sexual revolution and of course has several goals. The deconstruction of gender especially maleness, the deconstruction of the marriage/nuclear family, and the deconstruction of individual and national identity. If you think this is an over reaction then that tells me you have not read what the activists feminists/homosexuals have written and most likely have not seen a typical gay pride parade where public obscenity is on display in ways not seen outside of the gay pride context. It also means you don’t know the history nor have you noticed the tactic approval of grooming of underage kids. Liberace for example groomed a young man of 16 right out of foster care. The recent lesbian movie at Cannes is another indication of where this is going which involved a long drawn out pornographic sex scene involving underage girls which had the support of Steven Speilberg. Also a recent incident involving a 18 year old girl seducing a 14 year old girl at her highschool which the lgbt community has largely been rallying to support the predatory 18 year old. Also you must not notice the thought police tactics used against anyone even liberals who dare question militate gay propaganda or dare allow as Dr. Oz did a different perspective to be heard.

Too many young GOP are just ignorant and unread on this topic. They want to be seen as hip but this isn’t about being hip it is about defending basic ideas of decency and good society and ultimately liberty because lgbt militants like HRC are not happy with silence or tolerance they want forced submission, they want to shut you down, they want to indoctrinate your kids, and they want to leave no room for anyone who dares take a commonsense view of human sexuality in that men should only have sex with women not each other or vice versa.

Back when I lived in the Mission District of SF in the 80’s, thugs (most likely not Democrats) would beat up gays in the Castro on a weekly basis. The fags were a soft target, the kind that bullying sociopaths like to use for weekend entertainment. The gays organized into self defense patrols via the Harvey Milk Club and the Mattachine society and before long the thugs began limping away from that neighborhood missing an ear or two. This is for real. Attacks on gays stopped real quick.

We make the mistake of thinking that an issue starts with its most recent reporting. Most issues have a history that needs to be factored into the mix.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.