Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi

Possibly. But you missed one of the points I made. That is that the Left can turn something insignificant into a scandal. So what is a non-issue for those seeing things from the Right can easily be manipulated into a full blown scandal, with the sychophant butt kissing support of the media. In addition, how long has Roberts be on the court? It has been about 10 years now, long enough for the Democrats to find something to use. Whatever it was that got him to abandon his professed principles may have occurred after Bush vetted him. Or for all we know the issue could have been something to embarrass Robert’s wife or other family member. It is all just speculation at this point. But obviously something happened to make Roberts do a 180 degree turn on his judicial philosophy. With Obama’s minions accessing all US citizens’ communication, whether via phone, email, texts, or online, I hardly would think that they would ignore Roberts.


116 posted on 06/08/2013 7:58:19 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Nevadan
If Roberts is a flaming promiscuous homosexual or that he illegally adopted his kids, it is a big deal, not insignificant at all and Bush dropped the ball.

Also, why are Republicans more susceptible to SC nominees "backfiring" on the masses? Because they seek out more moderate crap most of the time, not ideologically pure Marxists like the Dems do.

Roberts is a moderate that Bush pushed, just look at his pro bono work, lol.
146 posted on 06/08/2013 2:31:31 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson