Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

Okay, in that post I stated that she agreed with McCain on immigration. The fact is that when I posted that it was before her speech today. I can’t read her mind. I can only go back and find her interviews and go by what she voiced in them.

I have never said she supported this immigration bill.

Her prior stated policy granted pathway and instant legal status. That is what McCain supports.

Since her statement today, I have not said she supported this bill. And even prior to that, I did not say that she supported the bill. I stated that her prior policy statement seemed to be pretty close to what is in this bill. I believe that to be accurate.

Simply saying you don’t want to reward lawbreakers doesn’t cut it when you voice objection to this bill for Palin, because she has actually said she won’t reward illegals, but then says in the same interview that by registering they are instantly legal.

If they don’t register, they have to leave. If they do register they can stay and work.

Palin can’t have it both ways.

She has still left it very vague what her true beliefs are. She doesn’t support this bill, she says, but her last interview of record says she supports a policy very similar to this bill.

The fact still stands, that you claimed I denied she came out against this bill, and I never said that. I listened to this morning’s speech, said some nice things about it and left it at that.

Once again, you’re being the old LakeShark. THIS is why I wasn’t buying into the game you were playing in the last day or so.


51 posted on 06/15/2013 3:32:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Now playing... [ * * * Manchurian Candidate * * * ], limited engagement, 8 years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Oh, I guess you DID say that stuff after all. Thanks for admitting it.

Yep, that old wascally wakeshark, just horrible in showing what you actually said.

Horrible.

55 posted on 06/15/2013 3:37:48 PM PDT by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

I agree with you, DoughtyOne. Pols go vague when the specifics of their positions are controversial or unpopular.

Palin has been woefully silent on this amnesty bill as it has gathered steam and moved through the Senate.

It’s a big deal that she spoke against it yesterday, and will be a bigger deal still if she really uses her Fox megaphone to stop it.

I hope she does, and yesterday was (just) a first step.


99 posted on 06/16/2013 4:51:06 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

I agree. It confusing trying to figure it out.


106 posted on 06/16/2013 5:47:58 AM PDT by Alex in chains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson