Skip to comments.
Report: McCain, Rubio Got Fox News On Board For Immigration Reform
TPM ^
| 6/17/13
| TOM KLUDT
Posted on 06/17/2013 10:46:09 AM PDT by jimbo123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
To: sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; GOPJ
” This is the biggest scam in the history of the GOP on its own voters and members.”
AMEN, brother! And by FAR the most evil!
To: sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; 9YearLurker
” I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Rubio gets the nomination after this if it passes,”
I would sooner vote for Hillary.NOT joking.
To: DoughtyOne
Not working with more than these GOP traitors currently realize.
To: stephenjohnbanker
84
posted on
06/18/2013 10:17:14 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Speaker John Boehner (R) no (D) no (R)... has more waffles than IHOP.)
To: jimbo123; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; ...
This morning changing channels I caught some of FNC F+F and one of their first segments was a interview with an author who wrote a book on illegal immigration who said the border is open and dangerous and that this amnesty bill ‘will destroy this country if passed’
Soon after that they did a 30 sec promo on todays Cavuto’s Your World having Jim DeMint on as a guest to talk about the same, how we must kill this immigration bill.
I conclude the premise of this thread post is false, that there is no general pro-amnesty bias across FNC.
85
posted on
06/19/2013 4:41:13 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: sickoflibs; jimbo123; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; BillyBoy
86
posted on
06/19/2013 8:13:44 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: sickoflibs
To: NFHale
” LtC Allen West jumping in against Rubio in a primary???”
Interesting!
To: stephenjohnbanker
I figured the Colonel wasn’t done yet... Good on ‘im. He’s a Patriot.
89
posted on
06/19/2013 12:07:25 PM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
To: NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93; ...
Well the man belongs back in office.
91
posted on
06/19/2013 4:28:41 PM PDT
by
Impy
(All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
To: jimbo123; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy
92
posted on
06/19/2013 10:34:38 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: sickoflibs; jimbo123; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy
I conclude the premise of this thread post is false, that there is no general pro-amnesty bias across FNC.The word "general" is a relative term. But I believe there have always been traitors on board.
93
posted on
06/19/2013 11:42:05 PM PDT
by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; jimbo123; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy
RE :”
I conclude the premise of this thread post is false, that there is no general pro-amnesty bias across FNC.
.....
The word “general” is a relative term. But I believe there have always been traitors on board.
“ Let me rephrase. I see no consistent pro-amnesty message on that channel. I don't see a patterm.
Cavuto had on DeMint yesterday to talk about it.
94
posted on
06/20/2013 4:36:59 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: Impy; stephenjohnbanker; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93
I was amazed at how swiftly the “powers that be” from both sides of the aisle went after him.
The good Colonel must have really made them wet their pants.
Flak = Over Target...
95
posted on
06/20/2013 5:30:29 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: jimbo123; headstamp 2; cotton1706; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Sean Hannity; holdonnow; Spaulding; ...
I've seen and heard a lot of Hannity, and I don't agree that he is (at least not now) on board with the Gang of Eight's immigration bill. Yesterday on his radio show, he had an extensive interview with Rand Paul, who went over a bunch of defects in the Gang's bill and contrasted them with his own proposals. Hannity didn't seemed disturbed by Paul's criticism of the Gang of Eight.
The New Yorker has a long history as a leftist piece of trash (remember when Sid Blumenthal did puff pieces for Clinton there?), despite its fancying itself as highbrow, and we shouldn't trust them to report accurately. Their purpose in this piece may very well be to stealthily sow discord within the ranks of us, the opposition. Operations like the New Yorker are keenly aware of the massive public opposition that derailed amnesty in 2007 and seem intent on preventing a recurrence. Let's not play up their bogus stories.
To: NFHale; Lions Gate; 9YearLurker; RIghtwardHo; Puppage; MichaelCorleone; crosslink; metafugitive; ...
Rush Limbaugh is
NOT supporting the Gang of Eight Bill. He couldn't have been more emphatic about that in his discussion this morning.
Please see my post # 96.
To: justiceseeker93
I was not under the impression that he was, but thanks for posting that.
98
posted on
06/20/2013 9:55:27 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: justiceseeker93
Rush Limbaugh is NOT supporting the Gang of Eight Bill. He couldn't have been more emphatic about that in his discussion this morning. Please see my post # 96.I never inferred that he was. Rush's continuing embrace of Rubio often blurs Rush's position on Amnesty because Rubio has defined himself as Amnesty. Rush no doubt is against Amnesty because Rush is self-employed.
Hannity is a different matter. Hannity may be self-employed on radio but on television Murdoch cuts his checks and he must take his marching orders from Ailes and Tokyo Rove. Anyone who watched Hannity's interview of Rubio on Fox last night, had to be wondering why Hannity was asking questions using the term conservatives in the third person and why Rubio was answering questions using the term conservatives in the third person. As I posted on another thread, Hannity is not really a conservative, he just plays one on what the MSM refers to as right-wing radio.
To: metafugitive
I agree with you re: Rush and Hannity, but I don’t think self-employment is determinative. The self-employed who benefit from illegal labor tend to be for amnesty, for example.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson