Left Loses Big in Citizenship-Verification Supreme Court Case

PJ Media ^ | June 17, 2013 | J. Christian Adams

[American Constitutionalist]

Ok,, here you go .... hope it makes headlines and reaches the ears of those on Congress who is going to for this god aw full bill.




EXRTA ! EXTRA ! READ ALL ABOUT IT PEOPLE !


SUPREME COURT CASE NOIDS !

VOIDS !

SLICES AND DICES THE NEED TO VOTE FOR SHAMISITY IN CONGRESS !
NO NEED TO VOTE FOR SHAMISTY !


NO NEED TO VOTE FOR SHAMISTY !


NO NEED TO VOTE FOR SHAMISTIY SINCE THE SUPPREME COURT MADE IT IRRELEVANT !

EXTRA ! EXTRA !

READ ALL ABOUT IT AND SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOF TOPS PEOPLE !

NO NEED FOR SHAMISITY SUPREME COURT MADE IT IRRELEVANT !

Nope, not shouting, but, headline news.

[PieterCasparzen]

Uh, aren’t the powers pushing wide open voter registration going to send out hundreds of thousands of “voting activists” all over the nation armed with bundles of Federal forms ?

I’ll bet you see AZ flooded with Federal forms with no citizenship proof required.

Am I missing something ?

[smoothsailing]

Just a thought, anyways ...

It's a good thought, I can certainly see that being the case.

[jazusamo]

Bump for a good thought and theory.

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[matt04]

ping for later

[jeffc]

Ok, great, if what he says is true. But how do we know states will use their form over the federal form (gathering dust in the back room, like he says)? What’s to stop libs from starting all over and suing states to force them to use the federal form ? What’s to stop lib 501c3’s or 4’s from handing out federal forms 3 or 4 days before an election and telling people to use them over state forms?

[Ray76]

Exactly.

[bboop]

Thanks for posting.

[BuckeyeTexan]

See Adams’ opinion about AZ using state forms. Is that what you mentioned earlier today?

[BuckeyeTexan]

Excellent analysis by Adams, as usual. Thanks for the ping.

[Jane Long]

If J. Christian Adams feels this strongly then it’s time to celebrate.

I’ve wondered about this decision today, particularly the fact that Scalia took the lead.

Agree completely. J. Christian Adams is great.

[Lancey Howard]

(( ping ))

[jazusamo]

As I see it there’s nothing to stop a state from using the fed form and I’d bet some blue states will or at least some dyed-in-the-wool areas of some blue states will.

On the other hand red states or red areas in all states are not required to use the fed form.

I think it’s a win, as Adams has stated.

[jazusamo]

Agreed, and you’re most welcome.

[Still Thinking]

Doesn’t matter. In those states, they’ll register every illegal/dead person/dog/zombie they can regardless of what forms they’re using. The decision is only relevant in conservative states, or at least in states in which the voter registrars are honest (same thing).

[FreedomStar3028]

The decision is bad, it sets a precedent that FEDERAL LAW CAN USURP STATES IN VOTING. Think about it, all the feds have to do is create another alphabet group to MONITOR AND CONTROL state elections, that require federal forms, for monitoring purposes.

They will just change more rules. After the current govs abusive use of post 9-11 national security measures, anyone that thinks the left won’t exploit any advantage they have is living in a sane world.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Now that is right thinking.

[MHGinTN]

It was. Nice to see Adams’ thoughts, too.

[Still Thinking]

Are the states required to accept the federal form at all? The decision may just say that if they accept it, they may not require proof of citizenship, not that they must accept it.