[editor-surveyor]

>> “I then refuted you claim that ‘all mass murderers were on psycotropic drugs’” <<

.
That is not a refutation, its the rejection of the facts.

[CottShop]

[[That is not a refutation, its the rejection of the facts.]]

I didn’t reject the facts- the FACTS are that mass murders have ALWAYS occured even before the invention of antidepressants- contrary to your “:Antidepreesants cause all mass murders” (I guess the mass murder/genocides in africa were ‘caused’ by peopel on antidepressants too, or hte genocide in libya, iraq, syria so on and so forth- all ‘caused’ psycotropic drugs)

You provided a lsit of peopel who ‘at soem point’ took drugs and later committed mass murders- since you claim there caqn be NO OTHER CASES than the the drugs, prove it- prove they couldn’t have committed those murders because htey were simply sick- oh that’s right- you don’t have to privide evidnece- you only have to point to a site that provides nothign but VAGUE anectdotal evidence and doesn’t make clear whether coming off hte drugs ‘caused’ them to revert to their violent behavior or not- nope-

[[That is not a refutation, its the rejection of the facts.]]

If this is the meat of your argument- not itnerested in discussing htis issue further with someoen who consitantly ignroes facts and simpyl says ‘nuh uh’