Skip to comments.
SCOTUS Live blog of orders and opinions June 20th, 2013
Posted on 06/20/2013 5:14:09 AM PDT by Perdogg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Perdogg
21
posted on
06/20/2013 7:26:41 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
To: Perdogg
They’re really stretching it out.
22
posted on
06/20/2013 7:30:21 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: SE Mom
It is not usually long. Ending on the last Thursday in June is not unprecedented.
23
posted on
06/20/2013 7:33:01 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Perdogg
Ooh, that AID decision could have some far-reaching effects. No wonder the blog is taking its time on its analysis.
24
posted on
06/20/2013 7:34:05 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
To: NonValueAdded
The third ruling: AID - The gov’t can’t require groups to affirm their opposition to sex trafficking and prostitution. Violates 1st A.
25
posted on
06/20/2013 7:36:06 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: NonValueAdded
If the govt cannot force groups to renounce prostitution and sex trafficking, it cannot require, let’s say, a church to fund abortions if it doesn’t want to.
26
posted on
06/20/2013 7:37:57 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Perdogg
Yes, placing a limit on what strings Congress can attach to grant money. I’m thinking about Planned Parenthood and its ilk. I suppose the difference is having a restriction about what you can say/believe/promote vs restrictions on how the money can be used. The problem is that money is fungible and using the grant to do x which the grant intends frees up money to do y, which is against the intent of Congress. Solution, no more grants!
27
posted on
06/20/2013 7:39:22 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
To: Perdogg
United States v. Windsor - Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act
I want to see SCOTUS slap little Barry down on this one - Barry the Constitutional "Professor" - NOT.
28
posted on
06/20/2013 7:39:33 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Perdogg
Thank You for this ping. Watching to see how much blackmail has been done on certain sc members and is it to be ... Game, Set, Match.
29
posted on
06/20/2013 7:39:47 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
To: Perdogg
Ok, you’re thinking positive, I negative. Now I see the upside. thanks.,
30
posted on
06/20/2013 7:40:16 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
To: NonValueAdded
This is good because it means some funding will not pass since there is no guarantee who would actually get the money.
31
posted on
06/20/2013 7:56:15 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Perdogg
32
posted on
06/20/2013 8:14:08 AM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: fatima
you are welcome - the biggies next week.
33
posted on
06/20/2013 8:15:06 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
34
posted on
06/20/2013 8:24:23 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Perdogg
So which one’s are the big one’s.?
35
posted on
06/20/2013 8:25:24 AM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: fatima
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Affirmative action
Shelby County v. Holder - Constitutionality of Section 5 of Voting Rights Act
Hollingsworth v. Perry - California’s definition of marriage and the Equal Protection Clause
United States v. Windsor - Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act
36
posted on
06/20/2013 8:30:49 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
To: Perdogg
Thanks again ((((Hugs))))
37
posted on
06/20/2013 8:37:15 AM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: Turbo Pig
**DOMA will be tossed.
Result: This will open a flood gates for a federal definition on marriage**
I don’t think so, but maybe I’m just too Catholic and know the Bible too well.
What is in it that would make it get tossed out?
38
posted on
06/20/2013 6:12:38 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson