Posted on 06/21/2013 10:46:46 AM PDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3034026/posts
Bloomberg’s group has been traveling the country reading a list of those dead from gun violence...including those killed by the police, and those killed in self-defense by private citizens. They even originally read off Boston Marathon terrorist Tamerlan Tsarnaev as a victim of gun violence, having been killed during a shoot out with the police..
They are so uncritical and unthinking that they include a sizable number who clearly don’t belong, and are willing to use even people who needed to be made dead to support disarming the rest of us. This is pretty egregious, and an obvious example even in the more ‘normal’ situations...without even getting to the outrage with Timerlan
Why do you interject that nonsense??? Or is it sarcasm???
Who in their right mind would engage such a vehicle with such an inferior weapon???
Why is that analogy always made in discussions regarding the ability of the people to defend themselves against a tyrannical government???
When the logical solution is so evident that makes the initial comment moot???
SARC`em
Ok, muh bad...I had a feeling it was sarcasm, but I was not totally sure...Thanks for the clarification...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.